I am not saying that. I am saying bug fixes should remain. Your last statement is not correct every bug fix should always go in master not just release branches.
Sent from my iPhone On Oct 11, 2014, at 3:58 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: I think we need to revert a lot, Animesh. I don't think you can say that all the commits since the 1st amount to bugfixes. At least they are not commented as such. And if so, they should have gone into 4.4, not master. On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com<mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us<mailto:da...@gnsa.us>] > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 10:20 PM > To: Daan Hoogland > Cc: dev > Subject: Re: [ACS45]reverting commits or branching? > > I agree - it makes no sense - I am working on a branch minus the latest few > features. I'm not done with it, but hope to have something up by end of the > weekend. > [Animesh] Yes we cannot delay the release branch. David, can you confirm that the bug fixes that were committed will be there. > --David > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Daan Hoogland > <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > H David, > > > > since our test day last weeks a lot of commits have gone into master. > > I saw Wilder's report coming by a week later followed by a lot of commits > again. > > It seems to me we should revert any commit dating October. It makes no > > sense waiting with branching this way. 4.4.1 is not done and needs yet > > another spin... > > > > agree? > > -- > > Daan -- Daan
