Thanks Min for the comment, make sense. Rohit, how do we plan to managed merge request or submit one? I don't think using the mailing list to keep track of merge request is good, does https://reviews.apache.org/account/login/ is keep up to date and all merge request should go there ? What about using Jira to follow merge request ? maybe by having a 'merge-request' issue type as sub-task?
Also I'm a bit confuse for some commit cases: Let say that I want to fix the release version display in the API doc, it is not code related right not it show as 4.2.0, it's not a bugfix or a new feature, so should I create branch + merge request or this type of commit could be push directly in the release branch (ie: 4.4) ? Sorry if I add confusion... Pierre-Luc On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote: > I would rather CI be considered together with this thread, since this > thread needs to decide at what condition RM can merge a hotfix/bugfic > branch to release branch. > > Thanks > -min > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 19, 2014, at 8:09 AM, "Pierre-Luc Dion" <pd...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 , CI shouldn't be another topic? > > > > What is required or missing to have CI in place? > > > > > > *Pierre-Luc DION* > > Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect > > t 855.652.5683 > > > > *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts > > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > >>> On 19-Aug-2014, at 11:29 am, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> Say you grab a patch from review board and stick it in a hotfix branch, > >> test that …call for merge on release branch. > >>> Do we *merge* to master or can we apply the patch directly to master > >> (git am -s…) ? > >> > >> Once the hotfix branch is merged on release branch, we would merge the > >> release branch to master, that will bring the hotfix on master as well. > >> > >> We don’t want to encourage working on master for fixes that qualify for > >> release branches directly so ideally we should not git am -s the patch > on > >> master. But there is scope for non-strictness for a situation needing > git > >> am -s <patch> on master directly, it would be at the discretion of the > RM > >> and committers. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Rohit Yadav > >> Software Architect, ShapeBlue > >> M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > >> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab > >> > >> > >> > >> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related > services > >> > >> IaaS Cloud Design & Build< > >> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> > >> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/ > > > >> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> > >> CloudStack Infrastructure Support< > >> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> > >> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses< > >> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > >> > >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > intended > >> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views > or > >> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > >> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not > the > >> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based > >> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the > sender > >> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is > a > >> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP > is a > >> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape > Blue > >> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in > Brasil > >> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd > is > >> a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under > >> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. > >> >