On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> > On 07-Aug-2014, at 11:23 am, Rajani Karuturi <raj...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Rohit, > > Thanks for the proposal. > > > > I do not agree to the third point that RM should keep merging to master. > We > > could do that at the end of the release with a single merge. > > By landing changes from release to master, we get continuous supply of > bugfixes etc. to master since master will need them as well. And we do that > at the time of release as well. > > From technical view, there is nothing wrong in landing changes from stable > branches to master and feature branches continuously. > the change flow is right from stable to master. But, I am worried it may add to RM's load again. Since master is under active development, it may lead to merge conflicts. > > > That said, its definitely better than what we currently do and hence a +1 > > from me. > > This is not a voting thread yet but thanks for your comments. > oops.. ;) -- ~Rajani
