On Aug 6, 2014, at 7:15 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > <alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: >> Edison, thank you for raising the concern about the BVT/CI. Somebody >> mentioned earlier that we should separate git workflow implementation from >> the CI effort, but I do think we have to do in in conjunction. Otherwise >> what is the point in introducing staging/develop branch? If there is no >> daily automation run verifying all the code merged from hotFixes/feature >> branches (and possibly reverting wrong checkins), we can as well merge the >> code directly to master. >> > > Yes! - please. > Doing this without CI as a gating factor buys us very little. > > --David
David, can you clarify. Are you going to be against any change of git workflow until we get CI/BVT in place ?
