On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > I think we should hold on with the git workflow implementation till all > the decisions on the items written by Leo, are discussed and finalized. > > The very beginning of ³git workflow vote² shows that the vote was just to > get people opinion on the proposal. Before adopting it and cutting the > develop branch, all the questions should be cleared out. >
I agree with Alena - the vote was framed as opinion, not adoption. Moreover, the document voted on has been changed ~10 times since we started the vote, and the differences are substantial: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=30738915&selectedPageVersions=32&selectedPageVersions=22 Agreement to do something and the following implementation are not necessarily instantaneous.
