On Jul 31, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> +1 on the proposal. But I second Rohit and Sheng Yang - we should agree on > all the flow points before we adopt it for CloudStack. We can¹t just > blindly follow http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/, > plus some use cases are not explained there as I¹ve pointed in one of my > previous emails. > Can you add to the wiki page then ? describe the use case that you have in mind and explain how to address it. If we all collaboratively edit that page we should be able to get to a consensus and have something that addresses all our current concerns. > -Alena. > > On 7/31/14, 4:19 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Hugo, I think we started this voting thread to get opinion on the >> proposal. I feel it may need some iteration and community agreement >> before we adopt it. >> >> Suggestions, flames and opinions are welcome. >> >> Regards. >> >> >> On 31-Jul-2014, at 12:43 pm, Hugo Trippaers <h...@trippaers.nl> wrote: >> >>> Rajani, >>> >>> To make it clear for everyone. This is the vote to adopt this new way >>> of working right? Or is it just to get an opinion on the proposal? >>> >>> If it is indeed the vote to adopt this way of working it means that all >>> committers will change how we interact with the branches in the >>> CloudStack git. >>> >>> It¹s is a good thing in my book, but we need to be clear what the >>> expected result is when this vote has concluded in 72 hours. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Hugo >>> >>> >>> On 31 jul. 2014, at 12:28, Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karut...@citrix.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> We had long discussions on the git flow. >>>> I tried to capture the summary of it @ >>>> http://markmail.org/message/j5z7dxjcqxfkfhpj >>>> This is updated on wiki @ >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-ProposedG >>>> itflowbasedCheck-inProcess and is up for a vote: >>>> >>>> Can you share your opinion on the proposal? >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> ~Rajani >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> Regards, >> Rohit Yadav >> Software Architect, ShapeBlue >> M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com >> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab >> >> >> >> >> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services >> >> IaaS Cloud Design & >> Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> >> CSForge rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> >> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> >> CloudStack Infrastructure >> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> >> CloudStack Bootcamp Training >> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> >> >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended >> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views >> or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not >> necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If >> you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take >> any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please >> contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. >> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue >> Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated >> under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is >> a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape >> Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of >> South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue >> is a registered trademark. >
