+1 PL
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karut...@citrix.com > wrote: > Hi Hugo, > > Its mainly to get an opinion on the proposal. > I am expecting all the active committers to take a look at it and raise > any concerns they have. > > If we don’t get any -1’s or edits, we should start on it. > Post voting, if its approved, we should do the required git branch changes > as suggested in the proposal and all the new checkins are expected to > follow the new commit flow for 4.5+. > > if its not approved, we are either happy with the existing flow or we will > have some good suggestions with which we may need to start a vote again. > > > ~Rajani > > > > On 31-Jul-2014, at 4:13 pm, Hugo Trippaers <h...@trippaers.nl> wrote: > > > Rajani, > > > > To make it clear for everyone. This is the vote to adopt this new way of > working right? Or is it just to get an opinion on the proposal? > > > > If it is indeed the vote to adopt this way of working it means that all > committers will change how we interact with the branches in the CloudStack > git. > > > > It’s is a good thing in my book, but we need to be clear what the > expected result is when this vote has concluded in 72 hours. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Hugo > > > > > > On 31 jul. 2014, at 12:28, Rajani Karuturi <rajani.karut...@citrix.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> We had long discussions on the git flow. > >> I tried to capture the summary of it @ > http://markmail.org/message/j5z7dxjcqxfkfhpj > >> This is updated on wiki @ > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git#Git-ProposedGitflowbasedCheck-inProcess > and is up for a vote: > >> > >> Can you share your opinion on the proposal? > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> ~Rajani > >> > >> > >> > > > >
