Will, go ahead and submit to the 4.4 branch. It is opened up again for anybody to submit fixes. I will be doing some of the remaining release work and then start considdering a 4.4.1. To be clear, your patch hasn't made it into 4.4.0.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote: > Forgive me if this is not the right place to bring this up. If at all > possible I would like to get the following fix into the 4.4 and 4.3.1 > branches before they are closed for good. This fix makes the SDX usable > again. I have committed it to the master branch. > > Here are some more details: http://markmail.org/message/zcqisqm5rzre4vak > > Let me know if you have questions. > > Cheers, > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead Developer > > *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts > 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 > w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Mike Tutkowski < > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > >> Ship it! :) >> >> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > this is maybe not according to proceedings as defined, but this is a >> > result of +3 binding after more then 72 hours. >> > >> > anyone for drinks? >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski >> > <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Tuesday, July 22, 2014, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > > >> > >> You are right, Sebastien. Emotion got the better of me. >> > >> >> > >> +1 (binding) >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com >> > <javascript:;> >> > >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> > +1 on release >> > >> > >> > >> > ps: the vote does not have to be closed. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Jul 21, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < >> > >> alena.prokharc...@citrix.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> Pierre-Luc, >> > >> >> >> > >> >> I¹ve closed the bug as invalid. Here is the explanation why: >> > >> >> >> > >> >> The first attempt to upgrade failed because the new system template >> > >> wasn't >> > >> >> pre-downloaded prior to upgrade (the requirement reflected in >> Release >> > >> >> notes, for the cases when template is changed between CS versions) >> > >> >> What should have been done to fix the problem: >> > >> >> >> > >> >> 1) manually roll back your DB to the pre-upgraded version (we >> always >> > >> >> recommend to take mysql cloud/cloud_usage db dumps prior to upgrade >> > in >> > >> >> case rollback is needed). Currently CS doesn't support automatic >> > >> rollback >> > >> >> in case of failure >> > >> >> 2) while being on prev version, download the template >> > >> >> 3) start management server >> > >> >> >> > >> >> If you attempt to start MS for the second time when the first start >> > >> failed >> > >> >> due to upgrade problem, w/o rolling back, the MS will try to run >> > upgrade >> > >> >> one more time on the partially upgraded DB. And it will fail. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> Please follow the steps 1-3 above to fix the problem on your >> system. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> -Alena. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On 7/19/14, 8:28 AM, "Pierre-Luc Dion" <pd...@cloudops.com >> > <javascript:;> >> > >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >>> Ran into issue when trying to upgrade from 4.2.1. Got the >> following >> > >> >>> database upgrade failure: http://pastebin.com/wkkAVYu0 >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7140 >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> *Pierre-Luc DION* >> > >> >>> Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect >> > >> >>> t 855.652.5683 >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions >> Experts >> > >> >>> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 >> > >> >>> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Daan Hoogland < >> > >> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> >> > >> >>> wrote: >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>>> Hi All, >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> I've created a 4.4.0 release, with the following artifacts up >> for a >> > >> >>>> vote: >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> Git Branch and Commit SH: >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=ref >> > >> >>>> s/heads/4.4-RC20140716T1409 >> > >> >>>> Commit: c9672d8b5710e597bca3a81a7b06dc90c7f5b1f7 >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> List of changes: >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >> > >> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/la >> > >> >>>> test/ >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the >> same >> > >> >>>> location): >> > >> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.0/ >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> PGP release keys (signed using 4096R/AA4736F3): >> > >> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure >> to >> > >> >>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >> > >> >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >> > >> >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> -- >> > >> >>>> Daan >> > >> >>>> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Daan >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > *Mike Tutkowski* >> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* >> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;> >> > > o: 303.746.7302 >> > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud >> > > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Daan >> > >> >> >> -- >> *Mike Tutkowski* >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com >> o: 303.746.7302 >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud >> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* >> -- Daan
