-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23604/#review47986
-----------------------------------------------------------


Commit 6f9b3cc9d13bd1bc002ce0afad3ed416b590f882 in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from Ashutosh K
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=6f9b3cc ]

CLOUDSTACK-7108: Reading provisioningtype for disk offering in base.py


- ASF Subversion and Git Services


On July 17, 2014, 7:25 a.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/23604/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 17, 2014, 7:25 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7108
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7108
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The provisioning type was passes through test case, but was not read in the 
> library, hence not passed to the API. Hence the test cases failed as the 
> provioning type would be thin by default instead of sparse/fat.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py fe257f0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23604/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Log:
> Test to create disk offering ... === TestName: test_01_create_disk_offering | 
> Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test to create  a sparse type disk offering ... === TestName: 
> test_02_create_sparse_type_disk_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test to create  a sparse type disk offering ... === TestName: 
> test_04_create_fat_type_disk_offering | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Test to update existing disk offering ... SKIP: skip
> Test to delete disk offering ... SKIP: skip
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ran 5 tests in 0.301s
> 
> OK (SKIP=2)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashutosh Kelkar
> 
>

Reply via email to