I think the question is relevant to network creation as well. If I provide a domain that already exists, what is the result?
A couple of other comments: - are we going to handle the case of secondary IP addresses? - DNSAPI sounds generic, but it actually refers to one specific API architected by Globo. To avoid confusion, would it make sense to rename it GloboDNSAPI? Alternately, give the DNSAPI project a less generic name (e.g., vincular) From: David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us<mailto:da...@gnsa.us>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Friday, July 11, 2014 at 10:06 AM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] Implementation of DNS Provider for Bind (for 4.5) I tend to agree with Erik, flexibility solves the problem for more people, while solution 1 is likely the easiest to implement. I am not sure that it makes sense for most people though - and would really only work for greenfield deployments or clouds that had all of the DNS entries relating to instances in the cloud. First question; how are you intending on using it? Which of those solutions works for you? --David On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com<mailto:terbol...@gmail.com>> wrote: To push that choice over to the operator you could add it as a global/zone/network option. As an operator i would prefer to have my own logic to handle cleanup, but this varies for everyone hence the option :-) Erik 3. juli 2014 21:45 skrev "Silvano Nogueira Buback" <silv...@corp.globo.com<mailto:silv...@corp.globo.com>> følgende: Hi guys, I think you are busy because 4.4 release tasks, but I'm worried about the time to 4.5 feature freeze. I put the documentation of feature in wiki as requested and I hoped people read there and make some comments here. To help, I will put design issues that are in document, one by one, and we can discuss in this thread. After each discussion I will change the document. I have one question about removing DNS domain when network has been deleted. In my current implementation I remove DNS domain when network is removed. But if the DNS domain is shared with another network or maybe is a dns domain used outside ACS this can be a problem. What I can do with DNS domain when network is removed: 1. Keep the current implementation. Always deleted DNS domain when network is removed (works well if the ACS is the only manager for the DNS (one network domain per network). 2. Remove DNS domain only if the domain was created by ACS. This can be a problem if someone put records after ACS creation. 3. Remove DNS domain only if there is no more records there. Maybe DNS domain can stay forever there because an inconsistency that keep only one record. Which one is the best? []'s, Silvano Buback On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Silvano Nogueira Buback < silv...@corp.globo.com<mailto:silv...@corp.globo.com>> wrote: > Thank you David. > > I put design documents on wiki: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Bind+and+PowerDNS+integration+by+Globo+DNSAPI . > I create an issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6998 > too. > > I look forward to hearing your feedbacks. > > []'s, > > Silvano Buback > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:50 PM, David Nalley > <da...@gnsa.us<mailto:da...@gnsa.us>> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Silvano Nogueira Buback >> <silv...@corp.globo.com<mailto:silv...@corp.globo.com>> wrote: >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > I finish the first version of design document: >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kbPQJrBC87ZtR-t7LwHFDzAmT436ShtjwKE84FVfByM/pub >> > . >> > >> > Someone could give me access to put design documents in wiki? Bellow >> the >> > username of people work with Cloudstack in Globo.com and need access. >> > >> > snbuback silv...@corp.globo.com<mailto:silv...@corp.globo.com> >> > daniel.simoes >> > daniel.sim...@corp.globo.com<mailto:daniel.sim...@corp.globo.com> >> > lokama - lok...@gmail.com<mailto:lok...@gmail.com> >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Silvano Buback >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Silvano Buback >> > <snbub...@gmail.com<mailto:snbub...@gmail.com>> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Of course, I forgotten my account info: >> >> snbuback / silv...@corp.globo.com<mailto:silv...@corp.globo.com> >> >> >> >> >> Done. >> >> --David >> > >
