ok, Mike I will have a look how it came in and revert On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Mike Tutkowski <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Yeah, I just looked at the Review Request: > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/#review46838 > > It says it's for master (4.5), so I'm not sure how this ended up in 4.4 or > 4.4-forward. > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski < > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > >> Hi Daan, >> >> Please revert commit 99dd86e588fd28dedd5fb3b830297a8a4f885760 from 4.4. >> >> Also, please revert commit 45f0c7367680f4bfbcee470139b708d69322be78 from >> 4.4-forward. >> >> These commits actually break zone-wide primary storage. >> >> I was not aware that they ended up in 4.4 and 4.4-forward (I was thinking >> they were just in master). >> >> I performed some testing on this logic in master tonight and saw the >> breakage of zone-wide primary storage. >> >> In my opinion, we don't have enough in the way of regression testing in >> CloudStack to be comfortable committing code that can have such >> wide-ranging effects this late in the game. >> >> I think we should start asking for a risk analysis from the developer when >> code is checked in this late in the game (the more risk, the more important >> the issue better be and the more testing that better have been done). In >> this case, my entire plug-in would have been rendered useless in 4.4 by >> these checkins and I don't understand how the issue itself even qualified >> as a Blocker or Critical. >> >> Thanks, Daan! >> >> -- >> *Mike Tutkowski* >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com >> o: 303.746.7302 >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud >> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* >> > > > > -- > *Mike Tutkowski* > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com > o: 303.746.7302 > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
-- Daan