ok, Mike I will have a look how it came in and revert

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Mike Tutkowski
<mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I just looked at the Review Request:
>
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/#review46838
>
> It says it's for master (4.5), so I'm not sure how this ended up in 4.4 or
> 4.4-forward.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Daan,
>>
>> Please revert commit 99dd86e588fd28dedd5fb3b830297a8a4f885760 from 4.4.
>>
>> Also, please revert commit 45f0c7367680f4bfbcee470139b708d69322be78 from
>> 4.4-forward.
>>
>> These commits actually break zone-wide primary storage.
>>
>> I was not aware that they ended up in 4.4 and 4.4-forward (I was thinking
>> they were just in master).
>>
>> I performed some testing on this logic in master tonight and saw the
>> breakage of zone-wide primary storage.
>>
>> In my opinion, we don't have enough in the way of regression testing in
>> CloudStack to be comfortable committing code that can have such
>> wide-ranging effects this late in the game.
>>
>> I think we should start asking for a risk analysis from the developer when
>> code is checked in this late in the game (the more risk, the more important
>> the issue better be and the more testing that better have been done). In
>> this case, my entire plug-in would have been rendered useless in 4.4 by
>> these checkins and I don't understand how the issue itself even qualified
>> as a Blocker or Critical.
>>
>> Thanks, Daan!
>>
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to