This is not related to portable IP. This enforcement was added as part of commit 657d9e4789d73c7c8ed460e59f088b8cb9aa7697.
Anothony might have context for this check. On 11/06/14 2:18 PM, "Andrija Panic" <[email protected]> wrote: >It was not there pre 4.3, and it's just causing me problems, I had to >manually add database entries to vlan and user_ip_address tables, not very >convinient... >Thanks, >Andrija > > >On 11 June 2014 02:45, Chiradeep Vittal <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Not sure what this has to do with Portable IP. But I agree that the >>check >> should be removed. >> >> From: ilya musayev <[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>> >> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >>< >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> Date: Friday, June 6, 2014 at 10:38 AM >> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> Subject: Re: Anybody addressing this bug ? Overlaping IP subnets across >> different vlans >> >> Andrija >> >> I dont know if we can qualify this as a bug, this check was placed with >> some purpose in mind - yet its not clear what it is and why would >> someone think its bad. >> >> >> >>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=a3b1a >>49c303a929c754561ca07fd8a9ed84e0382 >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3911 >> >> Chime in on the discussion in thread above, >> >> Regards, >> ilya >> >> >> On 6/6/14, 5:48 AM, Andrija Panic wrote: >> Hi, >> aftger upgrade to 4.3, I reported a bug where CS will not let me add >> additional IP ranges.... when there are 2 vlans using same IP range - I >> don't see point comparing IP ranges across two separate broadcast >> domains... >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6814 >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> > > >-- > >Andrija Panić >-------------------------------------- > http://admintweets.com >-------------------------------------- >
