I would like to have Hugo in the meeting So let's make it 20:00 UTC I would suggest #cloudstack-meeting
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hugo Trippaers <h...@trippaers.nl> wrote: > > I can’t make 15:00, but 22:00 could work. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > > On 10 jun. 2014, at 10:14, Daan Hoogland <dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > >> Quite right: >> >> >> - Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis >> >> - Reusable work by Karl >> >> - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant router >> (and how to avoid them) >> >> - Work division >> >> - (next meeting needed?) >> >> Any additions? >> >> \DaanH >> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 >> To: Sander Botman >> Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; kis...@cloud.com; >> Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit >> Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs >> >> BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? >> I just want to make sure it's efficient. >> >> --Sheng >> >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman >> <sbot...@schubergphilis.com<mailto:sbot...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I can make 15:00. >> >> Cannon join at 20:00. >> >> Cheers Sander >> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone >> >>> Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" >>> <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> het volgende >>> geschreven: >>> >>> nice, >>> >>> so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 >>> utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 >>> (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As >>> the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the >>> highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine >>> as well. >>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >>>> <karl.har...@sungardas.com<mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com>> wrote: >>>> I will be happy to join! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>>>> <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>>>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>>>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>>>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>>>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>>>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>>>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>>>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>>>> >>>>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>>>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>>>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>>>> >>>>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >>>>> -- >>>>> Daan >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >> > -- Daan
