Sudha,

- The point is that there are bugs being marked as blockers that where
never discussed on this list. Someone has decided all by their own
they are blocker and didn't ask for feedback. I don't find that
acceptable.
- My colleague Wilder has done some validation. I didn't memorize his
report but I am sure his testing was more then just the release
validation from the wiki.
- We run an integration test which is base on our own marvin scripting
not on the automation at Schuberg Philis.

 So what remains is we should not release with blockers. no duh.

On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti
<sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Daan,
>
> - 1 on releasing with blockers
>
> - We have to get these fixed. People doesn’t get to blockers doesn’t  make 
> severity any less.
> - Also I did not see any upgrade validation done in community. Would be good 
> if someone confirms that they have done it already.
> - Do you know if anyone is running automation on 4.4 branch in their local 
> environments?  It would be good if someone post their results if they are 
> running automation in their local environments.
>
> Thanks
> /Sudha
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 8:24 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: [ACS44] blocker issues?
>
> LS,
>
> Here is the resent list with blockers at the moment, sorted by last modified.
>
> CLOUDSTACK-6623;Register template does not work as expected, when deploying 
> simulator and xen zones simultaneously on a single management server.;Bharat 
> Kumar;edison su;22/May/14 CLOUDSTACK-6755;[OVS] Can't create more than 7 GRE 
> tunnel networks in xen cluster;Sanjeev N;Murali Reddy;23/May/14 
> CLOUDSTACK-6779;[OVS] Expunging VM (deleting vif) deletes all the rules from 
> ovs bridge flow table;Sanjeev N;Murali Reddy;27/May/14
>
> CLOUDSTACK-6804;[Automation] Add host fails in KVM;Rayees Namathponnan;Kishan 
> Kavala;02/Jun/14 CLOUDSTACK-6603;[Upgrade]DB Exception while Autoscale 
> monitoring after upgrading from 4.3 to 4.4;manasaveloori;Rajesh 
> Battala;02/Jun/14 CLOUDSTACK-6602;[UI] createNetworkACL API action param 
> value passed incorrectly;Jayapal Reddy;Jessica Wang;03/Jun/14 
> CLOUDSTACK-6710;[Automation] VM snapshot failing with NPE in vmware;Rayees 
> Namathponnan;Amogh Vasekar;04/Jun/14 CLOUDSTACK-6842;[Automation] Detach 
> volume fails with
> LibvirtException: Storage pool not found: no storage pool with matching 
> uuid;Rayees Namathponnan;Unassigned;04/Jun/14 CLOUDSTACK-6791;[Automation] 
> DeleteNetworkCmd fails with NullPointerException;Rayees 
> Namathponnan;Unassigned;04/Jun/14 CLOUDSTACK-6825;[Automation] Create 
> template from snapshot fails with NPE in KVM;Rayees 
> Namathponnan;Unassigned;05/Jun/14
>
> The dates that you see are the last updates of the issues.
>
> Given that we are in release period I can not take an issue that has not been 
> for more then a week serious as blocker. What can we say about the rest. I 
> don't hear to much noise on the list about blockers.
> These are the most serious things we should be talking about.
>
> Unless some serious fuzz arises on list I move to mark all of the issues as 
> known issues and go ahead and release.
>
> --
> Daan



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to