Hi Min,

With reference to the wiki doc, I had a query.
In case of a customized role with deny permissions how will the listAll,
isrecursive ..etc. input parameters values will be ?

For example, there are two accounts and they belong to a group with Allow
all permissions. If I have to remove some permissions for only account 1
but keep them for account 2 is it possible?

Thanks
Meghna.


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Added API issues we found through IAM feature in the wiki page created by
> Demetrius:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/API+changes
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 5/14/14 9:34 AM, "Min Chen" <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >Thanks Daan. Yes, I saw that there is another thread about putting an API
> >request for 5.0 api. Once we are done with this disabling, we will put the
> >issues we have found with current API in that wiki page to take into
> >consideration when we design the new API.
> >
> >-min
> >
> >On 5/14/14 12:12 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Min,
> >>
> >>I think everybody knows I am all for less features per release. I
> >>don't think you are making a bad call, per se. I do think we should
> >>consider if we can come up with a total picture of what 5.x would
> >>require af the api, though. Can you add to the discussion what it is
> >>that is keeping you from implementing. And what requirements you have
> >>for the 5.0 api so we can start devising the architectural guidelines
> >>for the new api. more and more calls for a 5.0 are coming up lately so
> >>let's move forward. (changing title)
> >>
> >>On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> In the past several weeks, QA has done some testing on IAM feature and
> >>>found
> >>> several backward-compatibility issues. Even though Prachi and I have
> >>>tried
> >>> our best to fix bugs to maintain backward compatibility, we realized
> >>>that in
> >>> order to support true IAM model documented in our FS
> >>>
> >>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Identi
> >>>t
> >>>y+and+Access+Management+%28IAM%29+Plugin,
> >>> we will have to make several API changes that will require us to
> >>>increment
> >>> CloudStack major version.
> >>> Therefore we think that IAM feature is not ready for ACS 4.4 release,
> >>>and we
> >>> would like to propose to disable it in 4.4 branch and re-enable it
> >>>later
> >>> when community decides to go for 5.x.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> -min
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Daan
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to