By clean install you mean starting from scratch, not 'mvn clean install' right? I have been doing mvn clean installs...
Will On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Rohit Yadav <bhais...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Will, > > Based on my last memories of the apidocs tool and maven poms, I think it > used to scan built jar artifacts and reference them against something like > a properties file (commands.properties?) and internally scans bunch of > annotations in available class files to find apis and create apidocs. The > ApiDiscovery plugin uses the same approach to discover available apis but > during load time instead of build time. > > I would also recommend a clean install in case there are any caching > issues. See if this helps. > > Regards. > > > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > > > Hey All, > > Paul Angus and I have both tested this and this is what we are seeing. > > > > When we compile the the 'master' branch, the docs in > > 'tools/apidoc/target/xmldoc/html', but they appear to be the wrong docs. > > Yes, we know that the versions that appear in the output is hardcoded in > > the XSL files, but that is not what we are using as our reference. > > > > So in the 'tools/apidoc/pom.xml' the 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT is referenced. I > have > > also confirmed that when a build is done, the > 'tools/apidoc/log/@AGENTLOG@ > > ' > > shows that the > 'client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.4.0-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/' > > directory is being referenced. > > > > However, when I check the 'tools/apidoc/target/commands.xml', it does not > > include API calls which were added in 4.3 (I can verify with the > published > > 4.3 API docs). Also, the docs that are generated in the > > 'tools/apidoc/target/xmldoc/html' directory also does not have the API > > calls that were added in 4.3. > > > > I am stumped as to how this is happening. It is almost like the > > 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT is actually the 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT, but I am not sure how that > > would be possible. > > > > If someone who understands this piece of the software can have a look and > > verify what we are seeing, we would appreciate the insight... > > > > Thanks, > > > > Will > > >
