grep -v is your friend (or grep -ev even)

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Santhosh Edukulla
<santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com> wrote:
> We still see "Unknown parameters..." huge number of logs in server log.  May 
> be, we can make this as configurable or dump to some other log say misc log,
>
> if mandatory params are not sent  as per request, dump to the log and return,
> if arg types and arguments as per validation are wrong, then dump.  But 
> dumping every unknown param,  real issues get lost with these huge log set 
> rolling when debugging.
>
> Regards,
> Santhosh
> ________________________________________
> From: Nitin Mehta [nitin.me...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 2:42 AM
> To: Antonio Fornié Casarrubios; cloudstack
> Subject: Re: seeing "Unknown parameters : ctxdetails" for 
> addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail
>
> Thanks Anotnio.  That’s what I have been saying from the beginning. IMHO, I 
> don’t see much value in having this, but I am really concerned with the 
> performance of the apis especially in production setups.
> For this reason can we please remove this worker or at the very least have a 
> setting to not have it turned on by default ?
>
> -Nitin
>
> From: Antonio Fornié Casarrubios 
> <antonio.for...@gmail.com<mailto:antonio.for...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Sunday 18 May 2014 4:22 PM
> To: cloudstack <dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Cc: Nitin Mehta <nitin.me...@citrix.com<mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com>>
> Subject: Re: seeing "Unknown parameters : ctxdetails" for 
> addResourceDetail/removeResourceDetail
>
>
> If the parameter is correct then it should not be in the logs as unknown. And 
> so it should be added to the worker in the list of parameters that the worker 
> will never blame. That is the fix. Right?
>
> Perhaps it is not considered good that everytime a new parameter is added to 
> the api requests it has to be included in the worker. In that case then 
> perhaps it's better to just completely remove the worker itself.
>
> Thansk, cheers
> Antonio
>
> El 16/05/2014 23:21, "Min Chen" 
> <min.c...@citrix.com<mailto:min.c...@citrix.com>> escribió:
> Ctxdetails complained in your warning log is one of internal parameters
> added by ApiDispatcher, and is not publicly presented in the API Cmd
> class. For those parameters, they are not errors in the request and
> nothing to be fixed.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 5/14/14 12:46 AM, "Antonio Fornié Casarrubios"
> <antonio.for...@gmail.com<mailto:antonio.for...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>>The errors in the requests are created by these well known clients, that's
>>why they should be fixed. It's not that the admin misspelled a param, it's
>>more that the code that creates the requests (the js in the web ui,
>>cloudmonkey, Marvin or any other...)
>>
>>Cheers
>>antonio
>>
>>
>>2014-05-14 3:05 GMT+02:00 Nitin Mehta 
>><nitin.me...@citrix.com<mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com>>:
>>
>>> Daan - MS logs are visible only to the admin and not a general user. So
>>> are you saying this is for admin to debug in case he misspelled a param
>>>?
>>>
>>> I feel that this shouldn’t be ON by default and whether such logic
>>>should
>>> be part of CS core ?
>>> I also find it difficult to understand that in production the admin
>>>would
>>> commit such basic mistakes. I am assuming that he/she would be a power
>>> user and would be using well known clients - say cmd line or UI to fire
>>> apis against CS.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Nitin
>>>
>>> On 13/05/14 1:58 PM, "Daan Hoogland" 
>>> <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >It is usefull for users that misspell a parameter and expect behavior
>>> >related to it. not just in development.
>>> >
>>> >On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Nitin Mehta 
>>> ><nitin.me...@citrix.com<mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com>>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >> I introduced the parameter ctxdetails which carries all the context
>>> >> details (currently all the first class entities and their
>>>corresponding
>>> >> interface mapping).
>>> >> This would be done for each of the api and hence seen for all apis.
>>> >>
>>> >> I saw the code in ParamGenericValidationWorker and will fix this.
>>>Filed
>>> >>a
>>> >> bug CLOUDSTACK-6658
>>> >> But I am curious why we have this code at all ? It checks whether the
>>> >> params passed for the api are an exact match (nothing more nothing
>>>less)
>>> >> to the params we expect and if not throws only a warning as seen
>>>below.
>>> >> While it might be good for a developer setup it decreases the
>>> >>performance
>>> >> for production systems I believe.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> -Nitin
>>> >>
>>> >> On 13/05/14 3:01 AM, "Koushik Das" 
>>> >> <koushik....@citrix.com<mailto:koushik....@citrix.com>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>>I am seeing the same for many commands. So this is not specific to
>>> >>>add/removeResourceDetail
>>> >>>
>>> >>>2014-05-09 18:17:39,477 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-24:job-28 ctx-6eaab5d7) Received unknown parameters
>>> >>>for
>>> >>>command updateNetworkServiceProvider. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-09 18:17:42,584 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-25:job-29 ctx-9c9f87f4) Received unknown parameters
>>> >>>for
>>> >>>command updatePhysicalNetwork. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-12 11:13:29,079 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-1:job-3 ctx-146e0b74) Received unknown parameters
>>>for
>>> >>>command createPhysicalNetwork. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-12 11:13:29,188 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-2:job-4 ctx-923175d9) Received unknown parameters
>>>for
>>> >>>command addTrafficType. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-12 11:13:44,521 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-5:job-7 ctx-255c7f04) Received unknown parameters
>>>for
>>> >>>command configureVirtualRouterElement. Unknown parameters :
>>>ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-12 11:13:44,576 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-6:job-8 ctx-5bbd3334) Received unknown parameters
>>>for
>>> >>>command updateNetworkServiceProvider. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-12 11:13:49,705 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-7:job-9 ctx-382414ba) Received unknown parameters
>>>for
>>> >>>command configureVirtualRouterElement. Unknown parameters :
>>>ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-12 11:13:49,746 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-8:job-10 ctx-e806b020) Received unknown parameters
>>>for
>>> >>>command updateNetworkServiceProvider. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-12 11:13:54,873 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-9:job-11 ctx-6f762490) Received unknown parameters
>>>for
>>> >>>command configureInternalLoadBalancerElement. Unknown parameters :
>>> >>>ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-12 11:13:54,917 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-10:job-12 ctx-a9a7f4dd) Received unknown parameters
>>> >>>for
>>> >>>command updateNetworkServiceProvider. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-12 11:14:00,003 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-11:job-13 ctx-434a524d) Received unknown parameters
>>> >>>for
>>> >>>command updatePhysicalNetwork. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-12 17:50:42,708 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-1:job-21 ctx-706223d8) Received unknown parameters
>>>for
>>> >>>command deployVirtualMachine. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-13 14:19:43,496 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-4:job-31 ctx-aff14d23) Received unknown parameters
>>>for
>>> >>>command deployVirtualMachine. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-13 14:48:59,308 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-1:job-53 ctx-9cc47c4f) Received unknown parameters
>>>for
>>> >>>command startVirtualMachine. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>2014-05-13 14:50:18,255 WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>(API-Job-Executor-5:job-61 ctx-5ceecd58) Received unknown parameters
>>>for
>>> >>>command startVirtualMachine. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>On 13-May-2014, at 4:09 AM, Alena Prokharchyk
>>> >>><alena.prokharc...@citrix.com<mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> 
>>> >>>wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Hi Antonio,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I see following errors in the 4.4 logs:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>>(API-Job-Executor-49:job-2867 ctx-072e9ae9) Received unknown
>>>parameters
>>> >>>>for command removeResourceDetail. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>> WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
>>> >>>>(API-Job-Executor-50:job-2868 ctx-35195840) Received unknown
>>>parameters
>>> >>>>for command addResourceDetail. Unknown parameters : ctxdetails
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Isn¹t something that you¹ve fixed already? If so, what branches
>>>did it
>>> >>>>go to? If not, can you please fix it?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Thanks!
>>> >>>> Alena.
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >Daan
>>>
>>>
>



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to