Will try, thx. Not sure good question - when is 4.4 scheduled to be
releases - few months, or more ?

Thanks


On 29 May 2014 06:15, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com>wrote:

> Hi Andrija,
>
> Same issue with public vlan tagged got fixed, CLOUDSTACK-5505.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
> On 29-May-2014, at 9:38 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
> jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com>
>  wrote:
>
> > Hi Adrija,
> >
> > From the logs, the public subnet is untagged.
> > I think this issue is coming for the untagged public vlan in 4.3.
> >
> >
> >  1.
> >
> {"com.cloud.agent.api.PlugNicCommand":{"nic":{"deviceId":1,"networkRateMbps":99999,"defaultNic":true,"uuid":"e6b734d4-3302-4113-8ec7-5c205c90959a","ip":"46.232.180.248","netmask":"255.255.255.0","gateway":"46.232.180.1","mac":"06:5e:e8:00:00:27","broadcastType":"Vlan","type":"Public","broadcastUri":"vlan://untagged","isolationUri":"vlan://untagged","isSecurityGroupEnabled":false,"name":"breth1-500"},
> >  2.
> >
> >  3.
> >
> "instanceName":"r-779-VM","vmType":"DomainRouter","wait":0}},{"com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand":{"ipAddresses":[{"accountId":2,"publicIp":"46.232.180.248","sourceNat":true,"add":true,"oneToOneNat":false,"firstIP":false,"broadcastUri":"untagged","vlanGateway":"46.232.180.1","vlanNetmask":"255.255.255.0","vifMacAddress":"06:5e:e8:00:00:27","networkRate":99999,"trafficType":"Public","networkName":"breth1-500"}],"accessDetails":
> >
> >
> > From the logs VR logs, the ipassoc script got the interface id as null.
> > May 28 12:37:33 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> ethnull to appear, 0 seconds
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jayapal
> >
> > On 29-May-2014, at 1:08 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com
> <mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Daan,
> >
> > my problem is that I'm in production for 3rd day now, and restoring DB
> and
> > downgrading back to 4.2.1 doesn't seem as option for me at the moment,
> > since I would loose new acounts and single VMs, etc...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrija
> >
> >
> > On 28 May 2014 21:34, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:
> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Andrija,
> >
> > nevertheless it sounds familiar. I will be back in the office on
> > monday and ask around.
> >
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com
> <mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> > Hi Daan,
> >
> > I don't think this is my issue, at least I don't make use of private
> > gateway - this is just simple as:   create new VPC from scratch - Public
> > IP
> > is not assigned to VR eth1 interface inside VR...
> >
> > I have filed the bug:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6801
> >
> > This same thing happened previously to Andrei Mikhailovsky:
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-users/201405.mbox/%3C33347835.250.1399336340785.JavaMail.andrei@tuchka%3Eand
> > it is not resolved
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andrija
> >
> >
> > On 28 May 2014 21:01, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Andrija,
> >
> > this sound like something we seen as well.
> > can you check if this is it :
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6485
> >
> > thanks,
> > Daan
> >
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm having big time problems with Public IP missing from VPC VR's
> > eth1,
> > after upgrade to ACS 4.3.1 - did not found this filed as bug so
> > far...and
> > it worked all fine on ACS 4.2.1.
> >
> > No help so far from user mailing list...
> >
> > Below is a detailed explanation, and logs from inside VR, and from
> > management (all fine with management logs...)
> >
> > If anybody can help,  I would very much appriciate this, since now I
> > have
> > bunch fo VPC unoperational...
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> > Date: 28 May 2014 14:50
> > Subject: Re: VPC's VR missing public NIC eth1
> > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> >
> > and as I said eth1 is present:
> >
> > root@r-794-VM:~# cat /proc/net/dev
> > Inter-|   Receive                                                |
> > Transmit
> > face |bytes    packets errs drop fifo frame compressed
> > multicast|bytes
> > packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed
> > eth3:   11484     131    0    0    0     0          0         0
> > 11590
> >   131    0    0    0     0       0          0
> >   lo:     214       2    0    0    0     0          0         0
> > 214
> >     2    0    0    0     0       0          0
> > eth2:   32970     544    0    0    0     0          0         0
> > 2084
> >    24    0    0    0     0       0          0
> > eth1:       0       0    0    0    0     0          0         0
> > 0
> >     0    0    0    0     0       0          0
> > eth0:  150207    1319    0    0    0     0          0         0
> > 264232
> >  1180    0    0    0     0       0          0
> >
> >
> > On 28 May 2014 14:47, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Also, from /var/log/messages/ inside VR:
> >
> > This is a major show stopper - all our VPCs are unusable complete.
> > Anybody... ?
> >
> > May 28 12:37:33 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 0 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:34 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 1 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:35 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 2 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:36 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 3 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:37 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 4 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:38 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 5 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:39 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 6 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:40 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 7 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:41 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 8 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:42 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 9 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:43 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 10 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:44 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 11 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:45 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 12 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:46 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 13 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:47 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 14 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:48 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 15 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:49 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Waiting for interface
> > ethnull to appear, 16 seconds
> > May 28 12:37:50 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:interface ethnull
> > never
> > appeared
> > May 28 12:37:50 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Adding ip
> > 46.232.180.246
> > on
> > interface ethnull
> > May 28 12:37:50 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_ipassoc.sh:Add routing
> > 46.232.180.246
> > on interface ethnull
> > May 28 12:37:50 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_privateGateway.sh:Added SourceNAT
> > 46.232.180.246 on interface ethnull
> > May 28 12:37:50 r-794-VM cloud: vpc_snat.sh:Added SourceNAT
> > 46.232.180.246
> > on interface eth1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 28 May 2014 12:59, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Defined eth1 manually inside /etc/network/interfaces inside VPC's
> > VR.
> > iface  eth1 inet static
> > address 46.232.180.246
> > netmask 255.255.255.0
> >
> > ifup eth1
> > ip route add default via 46.232.180.1
> >
> > so now VR works fine (have access to internet)
> >
> > But again, adding new IP to VR, and enabling static NAT is
> > failing...
> > That is, geting new IP works fine (just associated with account)
> > But enabling static NAT fails, due to "resource unavailable"
> >
> > Here are management logs:
> > 2014-05-28 12:57:00,716 WARN  [c.c.n.r.RulesManagerImpl]
> > (catalina-exec-22:ctx-537ac57b ctx-8c44c786) Failed to create static
> > nat
> > rule due to
> > com.cloud.exception.ResourceUnavailableException: Resource
> > [DataCenter:1]
> > is unreachable: Unable to apply static nat rules on router
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyRules(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3915)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> com.cloud.network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.applyStaticNats(VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java:3963)
> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> > Method)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:622)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
> >       at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy240.applyStaticNats(Unknown Source)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> com.cloud.network.element.VirtualRouterElement.applyStaticNats(VirtualRouterElement.java:650)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> com.cloud.network.IpAddressManagerImpl.applyStaticNats(IpAddressManagerImpl.java:1762)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> com.cloud.network.rules.RulesManagerImpl.applyStaticNatForIp(RulesManagerImpl.java:1324)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> com.cloud.network.rules.RulesManagerImpl.enableStaticNat(RulesManagerImpl.java:602)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> com.cloud.network.rules.RulesManagerImpl.enableStaticNat(RulesManagerImpl.java:446)
> >       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native
> > Method)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:622)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> com.cloud.event.ActionEventInterceptor.invoke(ActionEventInterceptor.java:50)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:161)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
> >       at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy88.enableStaticNat(Unknown Source)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.nat.EnableStaticNatCmd.execute(EnableStaticNatCmd.java:129)
> >       at
> > com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:161)
> >       at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:531)
> >       at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:374)
> >       at
> >
> > com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequestInContext(ApiServlet.java:323)
> >       at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.access$000(ApiServlet.java:53)
> >       at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet$1.run(ApiServlet.java:115)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> >       at
> > com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:112)
> >       at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doGet(ApiServlet.java:74)
> >       at
> > javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617)
> >       at
> > javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
> >       at
> >
> >
> > org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:555)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProcessor.process(Http11NioProcessor.java:889)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11NioProtocol.java:721)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(NioEndpoint.java:2274)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146)
> >       at
> >
> >
> >
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> >       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:701)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 28 May 2014 00:58, Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jayapal,
> >
> > eth1 seems present (lspci and virsh comfirmed), but not started
> > inside
> > VPC's VR - (VR used for Shared Network is fine)...
> > I could confirm by virsh that is is plugged inside appropriate
> > bridge
> > breth1-500 (check management logs...)
> >
> > management log while createing new VPC (VR) -
> > http://pastebin.com/s77nu5Ei
> > The public IP is there, so command is fine for creating it I
> > guess...
> >
> > VR's /var/log/cloud.log after rebooting VR from CS GUI
> > Tue May 27 22:46:58 UTC 2014 Executing cloud-early-config
> > Tue May 27 22:46:58 UTC 2014 Detected that we are running inside
> > kvm
> > guest
> > Tue May 27 22:46:59 UTC 2014 Patching  cloud service
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Updating log4j-cloud.xml
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Setting up VPC virtual router system
> > vm
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 checking that eth0 has IP
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Setting up apache web server for VPC
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Enable service dnsmasq = 1
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Enable service haproxy = 1
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Processors = 1  Enable service  = 0
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 Enable service cloud = 0
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 cloud: disable rp_filter
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 disable rpfilter
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 cloud: enable_fwding = 1
> > Tue May 27 22:47:00 UTC 2014 enable_fwding = 1
> >
> > ifconfig (no eth1 shown)
> >
> > eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 0e:00:a9:fe:03:5c
> >         inet addr:169.254.3.92  Bcast:169.254.255.255
> > Mask:255.255.0.0
> >
> > eth2      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 02:00:7d:92:00:10
> >         inet addr:10.0.1.1  Bcast:10.0.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> >
> > eth3      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 02:00:78:e9:00:05
> >         inet addr:10.0.3.1  Bcast:10.0.3.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> >
> > lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
> >         inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
> >
> >
> > cat /etc/network/interfaces
> > auto lo eth0
> > iface lo inet loopback
> > iface  eth0 inet static
> > address 169.254.3.92
> > netmask 255.255.0.0
> >
> > lspci - shows 4 ehternet addapters
> > ethtool eth1 = no link detected
> > virsh - confirmed that eth1 is plugged to correct bridge
> > (breth1-500)
> > as
> > indicated by management logs, and shows good MAC address as shown
> > in
> > managemetn log on pastebin..
> >
> > This is completely makeing VPCs unusable...
> > :(
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > On 27 May 2014 16:36, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
> > jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > Can you please share management server and router logs in
> > pastebin.comto understand the issue ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jayapal
> >
> > On 27-May-2014, at 6:21 PM, Andrija Panic <
> > andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > after the upgrade to ACS 4.3 (from 4.2.1) existing VRs for VPC
> > lost
> > their
> > eth1 which is public NIC. VR got eth0(control nic) and eth2 and
> > eth3
> > (bith
> > belonging to Tiers). From CS GUI, it is reported that the VR has
> > eth1
> > with
> > Public network attached, but from inside (ssh to VR) there is no
> > eth1
> > with
> > public IP...
> >
> > Even after destroying those VR, they are recreated again, but
> > without
> > eth1.
> >
> > Anybody experienced same situtation ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> > --------------------------------------
> > http://admintweets.com
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> > --------------------------------------
> > http://admintweets.com
> > --------------------------------------
> >
>
>


-- 

Andrija Panić
--------------------------------------
  http://admintweets.com
--------------------------------------

Reply via email to