Hi all, sorry, to bother you again with this thread. Could at least someone that has the CS 4.3.0 deployed try to download a volume and/or a template?
Could someone also check the database, table “cloud.host” and look if there is an entry there for the running SSVM and console proxy VM? On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rafael Weingartner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, I am sending this to the dev list as well, hence I am not sure > if it is or not a bug. Sorry if I am mistaken. > > So, after I upgraded CS from 4.1.1 to 4.3.0, everything seemed to be > working just fine, however, whenever I try to download a template or volume > I am getting the following error: > ERROR [o.a.c.s.d.d.CloudStackImageStoreDriverImpl] > (Job-Executor-1:ctx-1cb86faa ctx-61f7e4f9) No remote endpoint to send > command, check if host or ssvm is down? > ERROR [o.a.c.s.d.d.CloudStackImageStoreDriverImpl] > (Job-Executor-1:ctx-1cb86faa ctx-61f7e4f9) Unable to create a link for > entity at ... on ssvm,No remote endpoint to send command, check if host or > ssvm is down > > I have already destroyed the system VMs in order to let CS recreate them > with the new system VM template. I logged into the SSVM to check whether or > not it was created using the new template and it indeed. Therefore, I have > ruled out that problem. > > Then, I took a look into the source code, more specifically at > > "org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.driver.CloudStackImageStoreDriverImpl.createEntityExtractUrl(DataStore, > String, ImageFormat, DataObject)" > and > > "org.apache.cloudstack.storage.endpoint.DefaultEndPointSelector.findEndpointForImageStorage(DataStore)". > > I noticed that it looks for an entry at table "Cloud.host" that has the > type “SecondaryStorageVM”. > > I took a look into the DB, but, there are no entries either for SSVM or > Console proxy in “Cloud.host” table. I mean no entries for the VMs that are > running. The older VMs that were destroyed have an entry there. > > Have anyone seem a problem like this before? > Is there something I am missing? > > The VMs are running, should not them be registered there? > > -- > Rafael Weingärtner > -- Rafael Weingärtner
