Alex,

I understood how to upgrade SSL, however; that's not the issue at hand. The
issue is I am looking for a guide to correctly setup a DNS Zone to allow
the console to work. As I mentioned in my first update, I have the
following:

192-168-1-1.cloud.domain.tld        IN    A    192.168.1.1 (reverted to
private IP to mask my actual IPs)

I have done that for each of my public facing IP addresses within my DNS
zone for the particular domain in question. However, in doing so, I am not
showing this to be resolving; thus resulting me being in a stand still
unable to continue setting up instances.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

- mo


On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Alex Hitchins <a...@alexhitchins.com>wrote:

> Hello Mo,
>
> You can see our guide here :
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack/how-to-mitigate-openssl-heartbleed-vulnerability-in-apache-cloudstack/
>
>
>
>
> Alex Hitchins | 07788 423 969 | 01892 523 587
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mo [mailto:m...@daoenix.com]
> Sent: 22 May 2014 02:15
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev
> Subject: Proxy Console (RealhostIP Retired) Question
>
> Hello:
>
> I am attempting to find more information (read: step by step) how to
> correct the issue that came to be when realhostip was retired.
>
> The links I saw suggested I setup the following for every IP address in my
> DNS Zone:
>
> 192-168-1-1.cloud.domain.tld        IN    A    192.168.1.1
>
> I have done that for ALL my IPs. Restarted my named/bind service. Not only
> am I not obtaining an A record with this configuration, but I am also still
> unable to proceed in getting console access as it states it's unable to
> resolve the DNS.
>
> All my other DNS resolves without issue, please note; 192.x is just an IP
> address I tossed in this e-mail for general purposes, I am utilizing public
> subnets.
>
> I have also purchased an SSL certificate went through all of that too, if
> someone could point me in the right direction or perhaps offer ideas
> (alternates) that would be fantastic.
>
> Thanks,
> Mo
>
>

Reply via email to