Yes. Integration smoke test. Regards, Gaurav
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>wrote: > Gaurav, to avoid confusion: these look like integration tests. Is that > what you mean? > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Gaurav Aradhye > <gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com> wrote: > > Hello Yoshikazu, > > > > Please take a look at this patch (https://reviews.apache.org/r/21682/). > > These are the unit tests I am talking about. These should not be present > in > > 4.4-forward right? > > > > Regards, > > Gaurav > > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Yoshikazu Nojima <m...@ynojima.net> > wrote: > > > >> Gaurav, > >> > >> This patch is intended to be released in 4.5 release, because when I > >> wrote up it, 4.4 feature freeze date was already passed. > >> I'm not sure which unit test are you talking about? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Noji > >> > >> > >> > >> 2014-05-19 8:20 GMT-06:00 Gaurav Aradhye <gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com>: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > The patch related to feature "Volume Provisioning" > >> > (https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/) is not present in 4.4-forward > >> branch, > >> > it is committed to only master. > >> > > >> > Is this intended? If not can you push it to 4.4-forward too? > >> > > >> > Don't know how but the unit tests related to this feature are present > in > >> > 4.4-forward branch and are failing in the daily run. I think until > this > >> > patch comes into forward branch, we should disable the related tests. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Gaurav > >> > > > > -- > Daan >
