The proposal looks ok to me. But it may involve several changes in our
code base, some places in our code we even used hard-coded separator
instead of using constants. With this change, some global cleanup needs to
be done to make sure that it will not bring regressions.

Thanks
-min

On 5/13/14 10:24 AM, "Damoder Reddy" <damoder.re...@citrix.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>While working on windowsfication of management server, I found the issues
>when creating a template from a ROOT disk snapshot.
>It is not able to create template out of that snapshot due to the
>snapshot path we are constructing before creating template is using
>³File.Separator² and on windows it would be ³\² instead of ³/². Due to
>this the template creation is failing from snapshot when management
>server is running on windows.
>
>Code snippet example is
>
>String snapshotInstallPath = snapshot.getPath();
>            int index = snapshotInstallPath.lastIndexOf(File.separator);
>            String snapshotName = snapshotInstallPath.substring(index +
>1);
>
>            if (!snapshotName.startsWith("VHD-") &&
>!snapshotName.endsWith(".vhd")) {
>                snapshotInstallPath = snapshotInstallPath + ".vhd";
>            }
>            URI snapshotURI = new URI(secondaryStorageUrl +
>File.separator + snapshotInstallPath);
>            String snapshotPath = snapshotURI.getHost() + ":" +
>snapshotURI.getPath();
>
>To fix this problem I am proposing the following solution.
>
>The path separator is specific to the file system(NFS, samba etc..) we
>are using as a secondary storage on SSVM. Instead of using File.separator
>in the path, we can add a method say ³getPathSeparator()² to
>³DataStoreTO.java² which is implemented by several file systems. And we
>will replace ³File.separator² with the above method call at all
>respective places.
>
>Anybody see any problems or any other better approach can think of here?
>
>Is this the only place we need to do changes or any other places also
>changes are required to achieve this?
>
>Thanks & Regards
>Damodar/
>

Reply via email to