What is your timezone?
Can we have it tomorrow morning?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:

> We can discuss it today at 3pm, Alex, if the time works for you. WebEx is
> fine, but we should make sure to record the session + share follow up
> notes with the community. The best approach would be - to update the FS
> with the design changes for this particular part of the code.
>
> Will be waiting for the webex invitation from you.
>
> -Alena.
>
> On 4/28/14, 11:23 AM, "Alex Ough" <alex.o...@sungardas.com> wrote:
>
> >what do have any web conferencing app?
> >If not, we can use the webex.
> >Let me know what time is convenient for you.
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <
> >alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Alex, that is totally up to you. I'm ready to review/talk any time.
> >>
> >> -alena.
> >>
> >> On 4/28/14, 10:35 AM, "Alex Ough" <alex.o...@sungardas.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >when & how do you want to have it?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <
> >> >alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Alex, please see the answers inline. May be it would be a good idea
> >>if
> >> >>we
> >> >> discuss the high level architecture - what DB changes you are going
> >>to
> >> >> make, how CS apis would or wouldn¹t get affected - before you do the
> >> >> coding? It would definitely save us time, and won¹t lead to further
> >> >> frustration. I¹m more than willing to help.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 4/28/14, 6:59 AM, "Alex Ough" <alex.o...@sungard.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On April 17, 2014, 8:10 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> >> >> >> > 1) Alex, I don't quite approve the fact that the responses were
> >> >> >>modified just to support your feature. User/account of region1 has
> >> >> >>absolutely no idea of syncing that your plugin is doing as well as
> >>he
> >> >> >>has 0 idea that it exists in multiple databases. I would suggest to
> >> >>keep
> >> >> >>these parameters in the DB of your component, and reflect all the
> >>sync
> >> >> >>updates there.
> >> >> >> > And in the API responses account should only see actual
> >> >> >>created/removed/modified parameters reflecting the time when the
> >> >>account
> >> >> >>was created/modified/removed from the very first DB of your region.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Just think about your component as of a plugin running on top
> >>of CS
> >> >> >>(and that plugin can be enabled/disabled at any time), and do the
> >> >> >>syncing w/o CS code knowing about it. CS just has to return you all
> >> >>the
> >> >> >>information that originally was set through the CS (w/o the help of
> >> >>your
> >> >> >>component). All extra work your component does, should be stored in
> >> >>your
> >> >> >>component DB. You can add a helper table/API where you reflect the
> >> >>sync
> >> >> >>time between the accounts/domains/users, I'm fine with that.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > 2) #2 is lined with #1. Please remove all the occurances of
> >> >> >>_rsyncMgr.update from AccountManagerImpl. As I said, your component
> >> >> >>should act as a plugin, and you shouldn't inject it to the CS core
> >> >> >>managers. Make all updates directly from RSyncManager after
> >> >> >>account/domain/user is created/modified/removed in the
> >>AccountManager;
> >> >> >>code without interfering with AccountManager.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > 3)RegionResponse.java
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > * Please add more details to the new parameter description, its
> >>not
> >> >> >>clear what it returns now:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > "the active of the region"
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > * add "since" annotation
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >1) & 2) I'm a little frustrated because I think you confirmed that
> >>the
> >> >> >updates can be inside the Account/Domain managers to guarantee the
> >> >> >atomicity of the transaction when we spoke during the conference.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Perhaps we misunderstood each other. When you/me/Alex Huang talked
> >>about
> >> >> it at the collab, we concluded that all the changes related to synced
> >> >> entries, should be done in Account/domain managers of YOUR component
> >> >>that
> >> >> does account/domain sync, not the CS itself. While the current fix
> >>just
> >> >> does the trick of not updating the initial created/updated/modified
> >> >> fields, but by introducing the fields that do duplicated
> >>functionality -
> >> >> sync_created/sync_updated/synced_removed - but across the regions.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >And the reason why the API responses need the synced datetime is
> >> >>because
> >> >> >the synchronization needs to compare which changes are later.
> >> >>
> >> >> As I said multiple times before, your component should act as any
> >>third
> >> >> party component doing CS DB sync, and run all the comparisons on the
> >> >>layer
> >> >> above Account/Domain layer of the CS. No modifications should be
> >>done to
> >> >> AccountVO/DomainVO as well as the CS account/domain managers. The
> >>synced
> >> >> data should be stored in the helper VO objects of your components,
> >>and
> >> >>the
> >> >> manager of your components should perform the comparison w/o
> >>impacting
> >> >>the
> >> >> CS code. When user looks at the API response, he should see no
> >> >>difference
> >> >> whether the CS runs with multi region setup, or not.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> You can also utilize *DetailsVO tables of the CS (user_details for
> >>user,
> >> >> account_details for account, domain_details for domain) to store the
> >> >> Synced time, instead of creating your helper VO object. These tables
> >>are
> >> >> meant for storing CS object details, that can be used by third party
> >> >> components/services. Refer to the following FS:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Ability+to+have+be
> >> >>tt
> >> >> er+control+over+first+class+objects+in+CS
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Account/Domain API responses shouldn¹t get affected either. If you
> >> >>utilize
> >> >> resourceDetails tables, the sync time will be returned when call
> >> >> listResourceDetails API for user/account/domain. Or your component
> >>can
> >> >> access those tables directly.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >- Alex
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >-----------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> >> >> >https://reviews.apache.org/r/20099/#review40690
> >> >> >-----------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On April 16, 2014, 7:06 p.m., Alex Ough wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> >> >> >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20099/
> >> >> >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> (Updated April 16, 2014, 7:06 p.m.)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Review request for cloudstack.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Repository: cloudstack-git
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Description
> >> >> >> -------
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This is the review request for the core changes related with
> >>#17790
> >> >> >>that has only the new plugin codes.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Diffs
> >> >> >> -----
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>   api/src/com/cloud/event/EventTypes.java 39ef710
> >> >> >>   api/src/com/cloud/user/AccountService.java 7e37b38
> >> >> >>   api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/ApiConstants.java fdb4558
> >> >> >>   api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/BaseCmd.java f6f21ae
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/region/AddRegionCmd.j
> >>>>>>av
> >> >>>>a
> >> >> >>f6743ba
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/region/UpdateRegionCm
> >>>>>>d.
> >> >>>>ja
> >> >> >>va b08cbbb
> >> >> >>   api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/AccountResponse.java
> >> >> >>2e50c51
> >> >> >>   api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/DomainResponse.java
> >> >> >>0c0281e
> >> >> >>   api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/RegionResponse.java
> >> >> >>6c74fa6
> >> >> >>   api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/UserResponse.java
> >> >>40e1561
> >> >> >>   api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/region/Region.java df64e44
> >> >> >>   api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/region/RegionService.java afefcc7
> >> >> >>
> >>api/test/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/test/RegionCmdTest.java
> >> >> >>10c3d85
> >> >> >>   client/pom.xml d8dbde7
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>engine/schema/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-engine-schema
> >>>>>>-c
> >> >>>>or
> >> >> >>e-daos-context.xml 489b37d
> >> >> >>   engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/multiregion/RmapVO.java
> >> >> >>PRE-CREATION
> >> >> >>   engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/multiregion/RsyncVO.java
> >> >> >>PRE-CREATION
> >> >> >>
> >> >>engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/multiregion/dao/RmapDao.java
> >> >> >>PRE-CREATION
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/multiregion/dao/RmapDaoImpl.j
> >>>>>>av
> >> >>>>a
> >> >> >>PRE-CREATION
> >> >> >>
> >> >>engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/multiregion/dao/RsyncDao.java
> >> >> >>PRE-CREATION
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/multiregion/dao/RsyncDaoImpl.
> >>>>>>ja
> >> >>>>va
> >> >> >> PRE-CREATION
> >> >> >>   engine/schema/src/org/apache/cloudstack/region/RegionVO.java
> >> >>608bd2b
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/test/org/apache/cloudstack/
> >>>>>>ne
> >> >>>>tw
> >> >> >>ork/contrail/management/MockAccountManager.java 957f708
> >> >> >>   plugins/pom.xml 9b391b8
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>server/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-server-core-managers
> >>>>>>-c
> >> >>>>on
> >> >> >>text.xml fc1c7e2
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiDispatcher.java 95074e2
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java 38f2f0b
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/api/dispatch/ParamProcessWorker.java
> >>e9bdd8b
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/api/query/dao/AccountJoinDaoImpl.java
> >>ecd97c7
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/api/query/dao/UserAccountJoinDaoImpl.java
> >> >> >>923a238
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/event/ActionEventUtils.java 28e5680
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/multiregion/RsyncManager.java PRE-CREATION
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/multiregion/RsyncManagerImpl.java
> >>PRE-CREATION
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/projects/ProjectManagerImpl.java d10c059
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/user/AccountManager.java 03bf842
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/user/AccountManagerImpl.java 2070ee6
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/user/DomainManager.java f72b18a
> >> >> >>   server/src/com/cloud/user/DomainManagerImpl.java fbbe0c2
> >> >> >>   server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/region/RegionManager.java
> >>6f25481
> >> >> >>   server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/region/RegionManagerImpl.java
> >> >> >>8910714
> >> >> >>   server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/region/RegionServiceImpl.java
> >> >> >>98cf500
> >> >> >>   server/test/com/cloud/api/dispatch/ParamProcessWorkerTest.java
> >> >> >>12051a6
> >> >> >>   server/test/com/cloud/user/MockAccountManagerImpl.java f373cba
> >> >> >>   server/test/com/cloud/user/MockDomainManagerImpl.java 7dddefb
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/networkoffering/ChildTestConfigurat
> >>>>>>io
> >> >>>>n.
> >> >> >>java 22516c0
> >> >> >>   server/test/org/apache/cloudstack/region/RegionManagerTest.java
> >> >> >>d7bc537
> >> >> >>   setup/db/db/schema-440to450.sql 2bd5386
> >> >> >>   ui/scripts/regions.js 66dae8c
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20099/diff/
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Testing
> >> >> >> -------
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 1. Successfully tested real time synchronization as soon as
> >>resources
> >> >> >>are created/deleted/modified in one region.
> >> >> >> 2. Successfully tested full scans to synchronize resources that
> >>were
> >> >> >>missed during real time synchronization because of any reasons like
> >> >> >>network connection issues.
> >> >> >> 3. The tests were done manually and also automatically by randomly
> >> >> >>generating changes each region.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Alex Ough
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to