One answer inline... mobile bilingual spell checker used
Op 24 apr. 2014 16:54 schreef "Karl Harris" <karl.har...@sungardas.com>: .... > A related question is should the vrr > protocol<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Router_Redundancy_Protocol> > used > by Keepalived <http://www.keepalived.org/> be passed on the Cloudstack > Management network or an isolated network between the master and > backup router? On all the networks that should be served redundantly, e.g. all. > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com >wrote: > > > Sounds like a single guru should do the job. > > Also I would think of some offerings that contain affinity so that the > > guru has a guideline as to where to deploy the pair of routers. For a > > certain type of network design a admin may already know where the > > routers should be deployed and in that case it makes no sense to let > > the guru do any calculations on that. The admin should be able to > > specify it with tags or the likes. Of course the criteria you mention > > must not conflict but I think it makes sense to have a admin created > > offering override the standard algorithm. > > > > regards, > > Daan > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Karl Harris <karl.har...@sungardas.com> > > wrote: > > > The functional spec for Redundant Virtual Router for VPC's states: > > > Deployment for RvR > > > > > > - Mgmt server would try to deploy two VR in the physical devices as > > far > > > apart as possible. It would try different pod, different cluster, > > different > > > storage, different host first, until there is none of above condition > > can > > > be met, it would deploy both of them in the same host. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is a design method in a PrivateRedundantNetworkGuru NetworkGuru class(es) > > > the most appropriate place to put this code? > > > > > > Separate Guru's for each of the pod,cluster,storage, host entities or a > > > single Guru that "designs" using the above criteria? > > > > > > Karl > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Karl Harris <karl.har...@sungard.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------- > > >> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > > >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18795/ > > >> ----------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > >> Review request for cloudstack. > > >> > > >> > > >> Repository: cloudstack-git > > >> > > >> > > >> Description > > >> ------- > > >> > > >> Changes/additions to BASH scripts and .java files as well as pseudo code > > >> comments. This posting is a sanity check review posting; before I get > > too > > >> far along with making the changes required for this JIRA CloudStack-764 > > >> nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC I thought I'd publish > > my > > >> intentions to the community to review and comment. > > >> > > >> > > >> Diffs > > >> ----- > > >> > > >> core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/SetupGuestNetworkCommand.java > > >> 2cf5bf8ffaa2b0df122c69f047ee3f56982267e1 > > >> > > >> > > plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java > > >> 03af0da51b1eec93eb878fd1ebeca2ff2e0802ce > > >> > > >> > > plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java > > >> 69b7c9e07c753c0f0c93197a809acfb3399cf555 > > >> systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/vpc_guestnw.sh > > >> e5da2e096b30f6fdb15226e889517537d04f2e3e > > >> > > >> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18795/diff/ > > >> > > >> > > >> Testing > > >> ------- > > >> > > >> None, yet still coding > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Karl Harris > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Daan > > > >
