So I think it makes sense for most documents to point to feature
version (e.g. 4.3 branch, 4.4 branch.) E.g. docs for 4.3.1 should be
materially the same as 4.3.0 from a docs standpoint. Release notes are
the exception here, though perhaps they could be dealt with in an
additive way.

--David

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:17 AM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To add to what Pierre-Luc said:
>
> Readthedocs has something they call "releases" but those are in fact builds 
> that point to a branch. Not a specific tag.
>
> So the release version of the doc we would see on the website will be the 
> live state of the release branch, not a tag that we could vote on.
>
> That said, we have not yet discussed whether or not we need to formally vote 
> on doc releases :)
>
> -sebastien
>
>
> On Apr 15, 2014, at 3:56 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> makes sense! the only behavior that needs to be taken into account is
>> that of any publication scripts that we might write. So it seems to me
>> this is the best result we have from this version of the hackathon :(
>> & :)
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com> wrote:
>>> At the hackathon of CCCNA14 with Sebastien, we made few tests the RTD for
>>> documentation versioning.
>>>
>>> Look like we can use branch instead of tag for versioning and we can also
>>> select which branches are published on RTD.org
>>>
>>> So, in order to have doc version match product version, would it make sense
>>> to create a branch call 4.3.0 for the current CS version and start updating
>>> master for next version 4.4 ? once we will have 4.4 pretty much ready we
>>> will be able to create new branch 4.4.
>>>
>>> By using branches it allow us to update documentation without having to
>>> update is version.
>>>
>>> Make sense?  Have we missing a potential GIT behaviour  doing it this way?
>>>
>>>
>>> Pierre-Luc Dion
>>> Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
>>> 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101
>>> - - -
>>>
>>> *CloudOps*420 rue Guy
>>> Montréal QC  H3J 1S6
>>> www.cloudops.com
>>> @CloudOps_
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>

Reply via email to