On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Konstantina Chremmou
<konstantina.chrem...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 02 April 2014 10:46 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Better XenServer support in 4.4....
>>
>> I've talked about this all the way back when we were in Amsterdam and now
>> it's finally done.  Tina (Konstantina Chremmou) checked in a patch that
>> removes CloudStack's own copy of XenServerJava source code and
>> submitted a copy of the xen-api.jar into the maven repository.   Since xen-
>> api.jar is backwards compatible with previous versions of XenServer, only
>> one copy of such jar is needed.
>>
>> For those of you not familiar with this, CloudStack keeps its own copy of
>> three files that really belongs to XenServer:
>>       - xen-api.jar: CloudStack modified the source code to add a client
>> side timeout to fault isolate CloudStack from XenServer if the XenServer
>> control layer runs into trouble.
>>       - vhd-util: The copy of vhd-util shipped with XenServer is old and
>> does not provide the functionality to change the parent id of the vhd file.
>>       - NFSSR.py: XenServer's copy always creates a subdirectory and
>> utilize that subdirectory for its vm images.  CloudStack needed one that
>> doesn't create a subdirectory.
>>
>> With the release of hot fix XS62ESP1004, XenSever has incorporated all of
>> CloudStack's changes for the three files.  Unfortunately, these changes are
>> not back-ported to previous versions so CloudStack will only utilize the new
>> changes against XenSever 6.2 + SP1 + XS62ESP1004.  There is a new resource,
>> XenServer625Resource.java, that was added in 4.3 to work with this exact
>> XenServer patch level.  Unfortunately, the xen-api.jar couldn't make it in
>> time for the 4.3 release so we still had to keep our own copy of the source
>> code in 4.3.
>
>
> We could still change it for 4.3-forward though. I've submitted for 
> consideration a patch for that branch too.
>
>

Doesn't sound like a bug fix, so probably not appropriate for 4.3-forward.


As an aside, we need to make sure LICENSE gets updated.

Reply via email to