I think the VMware traffic label issue is related to these two: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4943 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5012
Seems that CloudStack wrongfully append strings in traffic labels, but the issues were marked as "non-reproducible." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Researcher Cloud Computing Dept, Chunghwa Telecom Labs ryan...@cht.com.tw or ryanlei750...@gmail.com On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:55 AM, ilya musayev <ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com>wrote: > I did find some issue - but relatively minor and nothing that could not > have been fixed via UI. > > I will open JIRA to address the issues. > > In the nutshell, i noticed some UI inconsistency and the way some pages > are presented - this is minor but the issue was seen in both latest Firefox > and Chrome on OSX. > > Another issue was related to VMware, if you define vSwitch0 under physical > network labels for MGMT, Public, Guest and Storage, ACS 4.3 looks for a > vSwitch named "vSwitch0vSwitch0". > > There is "vSwitch0" label that is defined as default in case nothing was > supplied for vSwitch0 name - which is vSpheres default vSwitch, however, i > decided to define it anyway to see what happens - surely enough it broke. > It appears instead of replacing my value defined in UI, ACS appends my > value + default value. As a result, vSwitch0vSwitch0 - is invalid vSwitch > in VMware, and attempts to deploy SysVMs fail. I havent tried defining > other vSwitches because all my test hypervisors only leverage vSwitch0. > > If i undefine the vSwitch0 label, ACS then picks up proper default > vSwitch0. > > > On 3/22/14, 3:39 AM, Wilder Rodrigues wrote: > >> Great news! >> >> Have a nice weekend, guys and gals! >> >> Cheers, >> Wilder >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 21 Mar 2014, at 20:08, "Animesh Chaturvedi" < >>> animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes >>> indicated with a "*" next to their name: >>> >>> +1 : Animesh*, Edison*, Ilya*, Amogh, Wilder >>> +0 : Daan * >>> -1 : Tanner (The issue CLOUDSTACK-6266 could not be reproduced ) >>> >>> I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo >>> now and other release tasks. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Animesh >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:06 PM >>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a >>>> >>>> vote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Git Branch and Commit SH: >>>> >>>> https://git-wip- >>>> us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3 >>>> Commit: 0810029f274878eca8fd74b44ab1117054e929a5 >>>> >>>> >>>> List of changes: >>>> >>>> New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/ >>>> jira/issues/?filter=12325248 >>>> >>>> Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/ >>>> jira/issues/?filter=12325249 >>>> >>>> Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/ >>>> jira/issues/?filter=12326161 >>>> >>>> Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/ >>>> jira/issues/?filter=12326162 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >>>> >>>> location): >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Testing instructions are here: >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pro >>>> cedure >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours (Friday 3/21 12:05 PM PST) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >>>> indicate >>>> "(binding)" with their vote? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>> >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Animesh >>>> >>> >
