I mean not returning a SuccessResponse but some custom variety to it.

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
<alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> We are not gonna change the response for API calls mentioned in the bug
> filed by David. We will just leave Apis the way it is. The original bug
> should be closed as WontFix, and I already reverted the commit.
>
> I didn't quite get your question about other APIs, could you please
> elaborate?
>
> -Alena.
>
> On 3/4/14, 10:28 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>We can not change the response for this api call? so other apis aren't
>>touched?
>>
>>On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
>><alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> Daan, you can¹t extend the response with more parameters as its a
>>>generic
>>> SuccessResponse used by many Apis, and you can¹t add anything a
>>>particular
>>> call specific to that.
>>>
>>> I think we shouldn¹t fix the bug at this point. You can always get the
>>> additional information you need by executing corresponding list* call.
>>>
>>> -Alena.
>>>
>>> On 3/4/14, 12:05 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>H Alena,
>>>>
>>>>You are right. I was under the impression that response format was
>>>>being extended.
>>>>
>>>>I saw you already reverted. If the response was extended with the
>>>>extra value it would be alright, would it?
>>>>
>>>>On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
>>>><alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>> Daan, this fix break API compatibility! All the customers using these
>>>>>API,
>>>>> will end up with broken code on their side. As the response format is
>>>>> changed. Can you please roll it back?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Alena.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/3/14, 2:03 AM, "daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>>>>>>https://reviews.apache.org/r/17591/#review35953
>>>>>>-----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Ship it!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>ebcaec8632dbd92c071317f3190915244a287afb
>>>>>>
>>>>>>- daan Hoogland
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Jan. 31, 2014, 2:51 p.m., David Grizzanti wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>>>>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/17591/
>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (Updated Jan. 31, 2014, 2:51 p.m.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Review request for cloudstack.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5872
>>>>>>>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5872
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Repository: cloudstack-git
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Description
>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> CLOUDSTACK-5872: Async response from addAccountToProject doesn't
>>>>>>>contain useful information
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Updated the following classes to return a project object after async
>>>>>>>jobs complete:
>>>>>>>  api/src/com/cloud/projects/ProjectService.java     |  6 ++--
>>>>>>>  .../user/account/AddAccountToProjectCmd.java       |  7 +++--
>>>>>>>  .../user/account/DeleteAccountFromProjectCmd.java  |  7 +++--
>>>>>>>  .../user/project/UpdateProjectInvitationCmd.java   |  8 +++--
>>>>>>>  server/src/com/cloud/projects/ProjectManager.java  |  2 +-
>>>>>>>  .../src/com/cloud/projects/ProjectManagerImpl.java | 34
>>>>>>>+++++++++++-----------
>>>>>>>  .../com/cloud/projects/MockProjectManagerImpl.java | 16 +++++-----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Previously these API commands only returned "success => true" in the
>>>>>>>aysnc job result.  Now it returns the project that a user was
>>>>>>>added/deleted to.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Diffs
>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   api/src/com/cloud/projects/ProjectService.java dc882ef
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/account/AddAccountToPr
>>>>>>>oj
>>>>>>>ec
>>>>>>>tCmd.java 36df579
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/account/DeleteAccountF
>>>>>>>ro
>>>>>>>mP
>>>>>>>rojectCmd.java f6aa36c
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/project/UpdateProjectI
>>>>>>>nv
>>>>>>>it
>>>>>>>ationCmd.java dda7b54
>>>>>>>   server/src/com/cloud/projects/ProjectManager.java f568146
>>>>>>>   server/src/com/cloud/projects/ProjectManagerImpl.java 5a0ed1c
>>>>>>>   server/test/com/cloud/projects/MockProjectManagerImpl.java dc377ff
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17591/diff/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Testing
>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Testing done on master.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David Grizzanti
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Daan
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Daan
>



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to