Hello,

Can someone grant me privileges to assign the jira item CLOUDSTACK-3272 to
myself.

Thanks,
Sonal



>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Murali Reddy <murali.re...@citrix.com>
> Date: Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>, Chiradeep
> Vittal <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com>
>
>
>
> Sonal,
>
> There may be mix up on the problem statement of the bug 3272. Sorry I did
> not elaborate enough in the bug.
>
> So there are multiple event types that are generated by CS, action events,
> usage events, resource state change events and alerts. Current problem is
> all the events gets published on the event bus when event bus is enabled.
> Intent of the bug is to introduce global setting config parameters to
> specify which category of events to be published or not be published on
> the event bus. For e.g if global config param says to publish only usage
> events, then only usage events should be published on the event bus.
>
> If your intent is to create generic mechanism to add meta-data to events
> that event bus can interpret and do specific action/configuration then it
> might make sense to open a different bug and elaborate what you want to
> address.
>
> Thanks,
> Murali
>
>
> On 16/12/13 1:11 PM, "Sonal Ojha" <sonal.o...@sungard.com> wrote:
>
> >As per the problem statement the config parameters would be the deciding
> >factor for the behavior of the events on the event bus. A subscriber would
> >never decide the behavior , instead the publisher of the event would add
> >config parameters to the events. On basis of these parameters the wrapper
> >over the queue broker could decide the actions to be performed on the
> >events. For example, the publisher of vm start event added a configuration
> >parameter "expiry" to the event. On basis of this parameter the wrapper
> >over the message queue broker would decide when should the vm start event
> >be expired / deleted from the queue. The subscriber of the event will be
> >able to read / fetch the event until its expired.
> >
> >There could be more than one config parameters attached to an event and so
> >the proposal is to add all these config parameters into a Map instead of
> >having only one config parameter added as a variable to the EventCategory
> >class.
> >
> >
> >On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> >chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >>  Forgive me for my ignorance , why can't this be done by the client that
> >> is receiving the events? Note that multiple clients can subscribe to the
> >> event bus: this requirement is specific to one client?
> >>
> >>   From: Sonal Ojha <sonal.o...@sungard.com>
> >> Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 11:36 PM
> >> To: Chiradeep Vittal <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com>
> >> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] (CLOUDSTACK-3272)
> >>
> >>   One of the use case be to delete only vm power on/off events from the
> >> event queue, other be to persist all the update events on virtual
> >>machines
> >> on the queue. The map of configuration parameters would be helpful to
> >> decide such behaviors.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:26 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> >> chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Some more description of the use cases would be helpful. What is the
> >>>pain
> >>> point it is addressing?
> >>>
> >>> On 12/11/13 3:26 AM, "Sonal Ojha" <sonal.o...@sungard.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >Hello,
> >>> >
> >>> >As per the description in the bug I would like to propose to
> >>>introduce a
> >>> >new instance variable configParameters of type HashMap to the
> >>> >EventCategory
> >>> >class.Currently, it could store one config parameter
> >>> >"publish.action.events"(key as String) and True (value as Boolean) but
> >>> >later it could add more config parameters to change the behavior of
> >>> >events.
> >>> >
> >>> >Thoughts / suggestions ?
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >--
> >>> >
> >>> >Thanks and Regards,
> >>> >
> >>>  >*Sonal Ojha* EURO Senior Engineer Product Development EURO  SunGard IT
> >>>  >Availability
> >>> >
> >>> >Mobile +91-9922412645 EURO E-Mail: sonal.o...@sungard.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>  --
> >>
> >> Thanks and Regards,
> >>
> >> *Sonal Ojha* * Senior Engineer Product Development *  SunGard IT
> >> Availability
> >>
> >> Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.o...@sungard.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Thanks and Regards,
> >
> >*Sonal Ojha* * Senior Engineer Product Development *  SunGard IT
> >Availability
> >
> >Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.o...@sungard.com
> >
>
>
>
>


-- 

Thanks and Regards,

*Sonal Ojha* * Senior Engineer Product Development *  SunGard IT
Availability

Mobile +91-9922412645* E-Mail: sonal.o...@sungard.com

Reply via email to