we have hosts with 80 vms. 80*16 > 160 , which is spedcified in the xenserver docs Joris came up with. That last part is not important to me but I am still worried about the size of the statistics post by the members to the pool-master. If we can make sure we don't cross this boundary I am fine with not making it optional. So to stress my point: even with a documented limit of 16 per vm there is also a limit of 160 per host. And the real limit is neither as we can instantiate vms with 32 vcpu (even on 6.0.2 i think Joris?) the actual problem is in the internal xapi traffic.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Harikrishna Patnala < harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com> wrote: > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/ > > On February 6th, 2014, 8:41 a.m. UTC, *daan Hoogland* wrote: > > Harikrishna, I would like to see the intermediate option of scale up to > double the amount as well. Did you revert it? Is there a problem with this > approach? > > Otherwise your submission is fine, of course. > > Hi Daan, > I did not revert any changes. We can put an option to scale upto double but > why it is required if vm can go till 16 (if at all 16 is the correct limit). > > > > - Harikrishna > > On February 5th, 2014, 5:19 p.m. UTC, Harikrishna Patnala wrote: > Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta. > By Harikrishna Patnala. > > *Updated Feb. 5, 2014, 5:19 p.m.* > *Bugs: * > CLOUDSTACK-6023<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6023> > *Repository: * cloudstack-git > Description > > CLOUDSTACK-6023:Non windows instances are created on XenServer with a > vcpu-max above supported xenserver limits > > VCPUs-max value is changed to 16 and only when dynamic scaling is enabled. > > Diffs > > - > plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java > (bf9b068) > > View Diff <https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/diff/> > -- Daan
