Abhi, The ticket you reference states that it works fine with java 1.6.4x or higher. Is that indeed the case? Then we don’t need to upgrade the java version. Also the same code is running in the management server, which also depends on java 1.6. Has anyone reported the same problems for the management server?
I’m very much against running java 7 on the systemvm while java 6 is still being used for the cloudstack management server. If we upgrade, we should do both. Cheers, Hugo On 21 jan. 2014, at 07:54, Abhinandan Prateek <abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hugo, > > I went and looked at several support tickets that were filed. > Filed this ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5914 > summarising the issue. > There was a good amount of affect that went into troubleshooting this and > finally nailing it to Java version. > > Several test were done in various environments to nail it down. I was not > able to find enough information to nail it to a particular java known > issues or get enough information to file a bug against java version 1.6.2. > Since, internally we are convinced that this is a serious issue we will go > ahead with the fix, I will put the patch for review for ASF. > > -abhi > > > > On 18/01/14 12:45 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" <trip...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey Abhi, >> >> Do you have more details on this? A stacktrace or error log would be >> great. >> >> I would really need to see the details before we make a decision on this. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Hugo >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 17 jan. 2014, at 23:42, Abhinandan Prateek >>> <abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> >>> In SSVM for VMWare, copying template to primary storage fails in some >>> cases with jre 6. >>> >>> -abhi >>> >>>> On 18/01/14 1:08 am, "Alex Huang" <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Why is jre7 required for vmware? Kelven, you have any idea? >>>> >>>> --Alex >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] >>>>> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 9:08 AM >>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: systemvm templates >>>>> >>>>> Hugo, >>>>> >>>>> First of all my bad that I jumped the gun on jre7 change. I will be >>>>> testing the >>>>> full build on master and then update the urls and other changes. >>>>> In the current template jre7 package is not available by default, >>>>> needs >>>>> apt- >>>>> get update. jre7 is a absolute necessity for VMWare template. >>>>> >>>>> Once I have a successful local build I will update the thread. >>>>> >>>>> -abhi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 17/01/14 10:20 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" <h...@trippaers.nl> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Abhi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have the debian 7.0.0 isis local on the jenkins server, so we don¹t >>>>>> depend on the external URLs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you want to switch master to the new image? No trouble for me to >>>>>> make it happen. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Hugo >>>>>> >>>>>> On 17 jan. 2014, at 17:12, Abhinandan Prateek >>>>>> <abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While trying to build systemvm templates I noticed that the urls to >>>>>>> download the debian images are invalid as in definition.rb in >>>>>>> respective >>>>>>> folders: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For 64 bit template >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.0.0/i386/iso-cd/de >>>>>>> b >>>>>>> ian >>>>>>> -7.0.0-i386-netinst.iso >>>>>>> For 32 bit template >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/7.0.0/i386/iso-cd/de >>>>>>> b >>>>>>> ian >>>>>>> -7.0.0-i386-netinst.iso >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will be updating these to following respectively, once I have a >>>>>>> successful local build: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/cdimage/release/7.3.0/i386/iso-cd/debian >>>>>>> - >>>>> 7.3 >>>>>>> .0-i386-netinst.iso MD5: 04c58f30744e64a0459caf7d7cace479 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/cdimage/release/7.3.0/ia64/iso-cd/debian >>>>>>> - >>>>>>> 7.3 .0-ia64-netinst.iso MD5: a6b93666a5393334accb7ac4ee28d949 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not sure if jenkins job is building the right templates now ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -abhi >>> >
