That was what I thought as well. What was the retionale to join them into one field?
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Kishan Kavala <kishan.kav...@citrix.com> wrote: > Daan, > Similar to firewall_rules_cidrs, separate table can be used to store acl > cidrs. Maybe in network_acl_item_cidrs. > > Regards, > kishan > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, 17 January 2014 1:05 AM >> To: Kishan Kavala >> Cc: dev >> Subject: cidrs in acls >> >> H Kishan, >> >> I see you implemented CLOUDSTACK-763. it merges a lot of cidrs into one >> field. >> The api doesn't check the field length. I enlarged the field in the create >> table >> statement to 2048 for the 4.3 branch. Can you help me think about a more >> solid >> solution, please. It seems to me those cidrs shouldn't be joint into one >> field. >> >> regards, >> Daan
