On Jan 14, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Prasanna Santhanam <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 04:17:55PM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> >> On Jan 13, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Santhosh Edukulla >> <santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >>> 1. requests package and nosetests2.7 are required to work with >>> tests. >>> >>> 2. As such Simulator (as mentioned below ) works and so inquired >>> to remove it from blocker, but its the profile which needs changes >>> and so mentioned below notes to fix the profile if agreed. >>> Anyways, however way. we decide and agreed to go, we will fix it. >>> >> >> Yes please fix the profile -don't remove it- > > Yeah - although not many people use the profile, if it's not too hard > to fix it, we should fix it. Right now, the jenkins jobs do not use > the profile and use nose to directly run the deploy script. Ok I created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5866 Still we should fix the profile for 4.3 Actually looking at http://jenkins.buildacloud.org : 1-the checkin tests (under simulator tab) has been disabled 2-the cloudstack-qa has a failed test-matrix since 29 days I am not super familiar with jenkins and the integration tests, but are we running integration tests on 4.3 in jenkins.buildacloud.org ? As PMC member I would like to see 4.3 passing tests in this public jenkins instance before cutting an RC. > > However, I'd recommend backporting marvin's dependency on python2.7 so > it can be run on any python>2.4. All that is required is to have > cloudstackTestCase inherit from unittest2 [1]. IMO, this will reduce a > lot of pain for those trying out marvin for the first time, going > through the tutorial and attempting to write tests using it. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4591 > > The marvin_refactor branch is a significant shift from the current > marvin design. It was meant to make test writing faster using > factories. This was something that Santosh had expressed concerns > about to me while I was at Citrix. I had not merged it at the time > also because of lack of time and inclination as I had decided to move > away from the project. So, unless there is interest now in that > direction to revive the effort, we should probably use a different > topic branch for any other changes. I created a 'marvin' branch for further refactor from Santhosh and others. > > ------------------------ > Powered by BigRock.com >
