On Jan 6, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Abhinandan Prateek <abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> 
wrote:

> Wei,
> 
>   I think KVM support for OVS was not a supported feature in 4.2. It can
> go as a supported feature in 4.3.
> 
> DevCloud is not a blocker.

For the record, I disagree with this statement. For 4.1 and 4.2 we had a 
release testing procedure which was based on devcloud.
While not a production setup, devcloud is used heavily for demos etc…that means 
that we won't be able to demo the official 4.2.1 on devcloud.

+0

> 
> We will go ahead with the release process as of now.
> 
> -abhi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 06/01/14 2:16 pm, "Wei ZHOU" <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Abhi,
>> 
>> I have two problems,
>> (1) 3a999e7 made OVS not working on 4.2, so I fixed it by
>> commit 79f609ca19fc44aab8de8294f234537936bc3613
>> (2)  DevCloud does not work after commit
>> 7f9463bb54f19e7676f8c6049d1ebc02330a730f. So I am wondering if XCP works
>> after that.
>> 
>> -Wei
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2013/12/17 Abhinandan Prateek <abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com>
>> 
>>> The 4.2.1 is re-spun mainly because the commit that was used to generate
>>> the previous RC did not get pushed to repo.
>>> 
>>> Following are the particulars to vote for this time around:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=ref
>>> s/heads/4.2
>>> commit: 1b2b58fe352a19aee1721bd79b9d023d36e80ec5
>>> 
>>> List of changes are available in Release Notes, a summary can be
>>> accessed
>>> here:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=C
>>> HANGES;hb=4.2
>>> 
>>> Source release revision 3911 (checksums and signatures are available at
>>> the same location):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.1/
>>> 
>>> PGP release keys (signed using RSA Key ID = 42443AA1):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>> 
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours (until 20 Dec 2013 End of day PST).
>>> 
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to