On 04/01/14 6:52 pm, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:

>Abhi:
>
>Please send a [VOTE] [RESULT] email with the vote tally.

Sure.
>
>I am somewhat surprised that 4.2.1 wasn't tagged using build_asf.sh
>during the creation of the RC artifacts. Are you sure you aren't
>sitting on the tag locally? Also the tag should be 4.2.1, look at the
>other tags for examples.

Due to multiple Rcs creating a fixed name tag does not work via script.
Daan suggested that we make a tag with date.
Anyways now that this RC is confirmed I will push the tag.

>
>Please keep in mind 5,6 need to hit the ACS blog, announce@ and a
>number of other places. Also keep in mind that we announce releases on
>Tuesdays to maximize the attention we get. This is less important for
>bugfix releases, but still good practice.

Noted.
>
>4 can be done by any PMC member; but needs 24 hours for syncing of
>mirrors prior to announcement. If Chip doesn't pick this up, I'll push
>bits in place tonight or tomorrow.
>
>Thanks for all of your work on this release; hopefully we haven't
>scared you off from RMing future releases.

It is great learning one, where you understand the various processes and
nuances, and two, keeping patience while addressing concerns from
community.
Would like to thank the many PMC members who helped me in the process.

-abhi
>
>--David
>
>
>
>On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
><abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> Now that we have the necessary votes we need to move ahead, these are
>>the
>> next steps, will be looking for advice from PMC:
>>
>> Next steps:
>>
>> 1. Tag the git commit with 4.2.1_GA
>> 2. Building and publishing packages (DEB and RPM)
>> 3. Publishing the docs here cloudstack.apache.org/docs
>> 4. Put the artefacts for download
>> 5. Finalise the release announcement:
>> 
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2.1+Release+Anno
>>un
>> cement
>> 6. Announce the release on the website
>>
>> I will take care of 1,5,6
>> In the past Wido took care of 2 (DEB packages) not sure who built the
>>RPMs.
>> Sebastien I am assuming that you will take care of 3.
>> Chip it seems you took care of 4 for 4.2.
>>
>> -abhi
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/01/14 12:49 am, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>
>>>Yep - I am otherwise happy with this RC. Consider my -1 retracted and
>>>a +1 (binding) (which I think gives us the three necessary)
>>>
>>>Thanks for all of the work checking on this folks.
>>>
>>>--David
>>>
>>>On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>> I know Hugo made something to include it in the rpm. I'm not sure if
>>>> this is on the 4.2 branch. Look in the root dir of the archive.
>>>>
>>>> @David: you casted a -1. Can you get your conscience to retract that?
>>>> @all: how do we go from here?
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>>>>> On 03.01.2014 14:32, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This spin was created by Abhinandan at the 17th so, give us a commit
>>>>>> id so we can determine if we can release it, can you?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Would this commit id be somewhere in the RPMs? Cause I long wiped out
>>>>>the VM
>>>>> used to build them.
>>>>> Anyway, the 17th should also be ok afaic, the problem I had seems to
>>>>>be
>>>>> related to KVM and the disappearence of the "-s" option for qemu-img
>>>>>from EL
>>>>> 6.4 to EL 6.5.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lucian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>>
>>>>> Nux!
>>>>> www.nux.ro
>>

Reply via email to