Thanks.

Best Regards,
Sachin

On 12/29/13 11:57 PM, "Hugo Trippaers" <htrippa...@schubergphilis.com>
wrote:

>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>https://reviews.apache.org/r/15825/#review30945
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>Ship it!
>
>
>commit 7f9683af859224b4aa0cae037acda063a9d1536e
>Author: Sachchidanand Vaidya <vaidy...@juniper.net>
>Date:   Tue Dec 10 09:02:25 2013 -0800
>
>    Added Virtual-Network and Virtual-Machine Model unit test.
>    
>    Signed-off-by: Hugo Trippaers <htrippa...@schubergphilis.com>
>
>
>- Hugo Trippaers
>
>
>On Dec. 10, 2013, 5:12 p.m., Sachchidanand Vaidya wrote:
>> 
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/15825/
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> (Updated Dec. 10, 2013, 5:12 p.m.)
>> 
>> 
>> Review request for cloudstack.
>> 
>> 
>> Repository: cloudstack-git
>> 
>> 
>> Description
>> -------
>> 
>> The code change adds UnitTest cases for Juniper Contrail Virtual
>>Network(VN) and Virtual Machine(VM) Model classes.
>> Only VN & VM creation test cases added.
>> 
>> 
>> Diffs
>> -----
>> 
>>   
>>plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/org/apache/cloudstack/netwo
>>rk/contrail/management/ModelDatabase.java 7f66a3b
>>   
>>plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/org/apache/cloudstack/netwo
>>rk/contrail/model/VirtualMachineModel.java 96cea95
>>   
>>plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/test/org/apache/cloudstack/netw
>>ork/contrail/management/VirtualMachineModelTest.java PRE-CREATION
>>   
>>plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/test/org/apache/cloudstack/netw
>>ork/contrail/management/VirtualNetworkModelTest.java 0938541
>> 
>> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15825/diff/
>> 
>> 
>> Testing
>> -------
>> 
>> Juniper contrail Unit Tests ran successfully as part of package build.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Sachchidanand Vaidya
>> 
>>
>


Reply via email to