On 11/12/13 11:24 pm, "Chip Childers" <chipchild...@apache.org> wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> Though I'm out of principle not very appreciative for the 'extra' >> fixes form RC to RC, ... > >Looking at the log, it seems that most of the activity are tied to test >script fixes. That sort-of makes sense, but at the same time it >triggers the idea that Prasanna proposed earlier... do we separate the >tests from the core project at some point. > >Other commits are clearly bug fixes, which are appropriate IMO. Is there a way to lock a particular branch after an RC has been cut ? With so many developers distributed across the globe I think it is very difficult to control the commits going into a branch after RC has been cut. As a RN I can only go thru the commits and see if any of those can cause unwanted changes and try to test those out. >
