'shared local storage' should be read as shared storage :)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com> wrote: > you might not have shared local storage in your cloud. so having to add > shared storage for the sole purpose of supporting system vm's would be > painful. > > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Darren Shepherd < > darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why do we have the configuration system.vm.use.local.storage? Why would >> somebody care if they systemvm is on local storage? I'm guessing the idea >> here is if it's on local storage we can't bring it back in a host failure >> situation? But don't we just recreate the systemvm? >> >> Darren >> > >
