> On Oct 24, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Donal Lafferty <donal.laffe...@citrix.com> wrote: > > It's been a bit over 72 hours, and I would like to now close voting on the > RDP client code donation. > > We have an acceptance with the following results: > > +1 > Animesh Chaturvedi > Devdeep Singh > Chiradeep Vittal > Ahmad Emneina > Rajesh Battala > Kelven Yang > Chip Childers > Clayton Weise > John Kinsella > Sateesh Chodapuneedi > Ryan Shafer > > +0 > Wido den Hollander > Daan hoogland > > The next stage is to put in place IP clearance paper work in advance before > the code can go into a branch of master. I will contact a PMC member to > arrange for this paperwork.
No need to contact any PMC members off list (unless there are legal concerns, in which case email to private@cs.a.o, not individuals). I just need an ack from secretary@ saying that a properly signed Software Grant Agreement has been received by the ASF to move through the procedural steps. Citrix has done these before, so they should be known to your legal dept. Thanks! > > Thanks for participating everyone! > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] >> Sent: 21 October 2013 19:12 >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache >> CloudStack >> >> As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of >> source >> for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated with the >> console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based VMs. >> >> The client's source is in the diff attached to the Review Board submission >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/14701/ >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/q6sfqrhosmirm3bg >> >> I would like to call a vote here, so that we have a formal consensus on >> accepting the code into the project. I suggest that it be accepted into a >> branch, and then we work through any technical concerns / reviews / >> changes prior to a master branch merge. >> >> VOTING will be left open for 72 hours. >> >> This is a technical decision, which means committer and PMC votes are >> binding. >> >> >> DL >
