On Oct 22, 2013, at 1:22 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Yeah, it was always a tech preview kind of thing. The basic operations > used to work, but since most of the available client tools > (s3cmd/boto/etc) had special workarounds for odd AWS behaviors (in the > return behavior), they would have a hard time working with the S3 > implementation in CloudStack which was based entirely on the WSDL. Shall we remove it ? to clean up the code Especially that it is easy to get an S3 store with riakCS, gluster or ceph radosgw. > > On 10/21/13 10:16 PM, "Darren S" <darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I didn't even know this feature existed until yesterday, so I thought I'd >> try it out, but it seems that the S3 API in CloudStack completely doesn't >> work in 4.2. Is it supposed to? Is this an official feature or some >> tech preview type thing? >> >> Darren >
