Well, here's the deal. I'm doing analysis right now to completely revamp the management of systemvm. Basically get to a faster, more reliable, more transparent way of doing things with far, far, far less code. I'm planning on putting a thread up for discussion in about a week. I want to have a relatively complete picture of how I think I can do this in order to not scare the crap out of everyone. (Just a preview, this will be implemented as a "new" thing/provider, won't disrupt the current implementation). Then I'll be working on it for about the next couple months I assume. I have preemptively put in a talk at CCC about this too, even though I know I haven't started the discussions with the community.
I've done VRRP orchestration of VMs in the past. I was able to do HA w/ VRRP. So while I don't know the specific technical issues that made it difficult to do HA in the current impl, I know it is possible. So... we'll see. I'm sure you want this fixed now and I'm not going to fix this in the current impl. Knowing how the current RvR code works today, I can see how the current implementation would make it quite difficult to do correctly. But yeah, I'm taking requests. Anything you don't like about the VRs, system VMs, etc. Let me know. You want it to make coffee and julienne fries, I'll see what we can do. We'll add raspberry pi integration :) Darren On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ooh, do you take requests? > On Oct 9, 2013 7:30 PM, "Darren Shepherd" <darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I didn't read the whole thread yet, but at the end of the day it's sounds >> like an implementation issue. So I'll just naively say I'll fix that :) >> >> Darren >> >> > On Oct 9, 2013, at 5:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk < >> alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: >> > >> > HA redundant virtual router >>
