Hi, +users list If any one is already using any tools for monitoring then please share your ideas. Also share the cases where you experienced service crashes.
Thanks, Jayapal On 05-Oct-2013, at 4:12 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Well just make sure that your script is resilient to its own crashes as > well. > > On 10/4/13 1:59 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" <jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am planning to write script utility to monitor processes and restart on >> the event of failure. It will also logs the events. >> >> Thanks, >> Jayapal >> >> On 02-Oct-2013, at 3:25 AM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote: >> >>> supervisord maybe? >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> From: "Chiradeep Vittal" <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 4:45:56 PM >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router >>> >>> Got it. Any other OSS tool out there similar to monit? >>> >>> On 10/1/13 8:24 AM, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Chiradeep Vittal >>>> <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>> SNMP wouldn't restart a failed process nor would it generate alerts. >>>>> It >>>>> is >>>>> simply too generic for the requirements outlined here. The proposal >>>>> does >>>>> not talk about modifying monit, just using it. That wouldn't trigger >>>>> the >>>>> AGPL. >>>> >>>> Let me restate my objection to anything AGPL. >>>> People are largely comfortable with GPLv2 software - Linux is >>>> ubiquitous. Many legal departments routinely prohibit GPLv3 software >>>> (we actually saw this when CS was GPLv3 licensed.) But the Affero GPL >>>> license is anathema in many corporate environments, and by forcing it >>>> on folks in the default System VM I fear it will hurt adoption of >>>> CloudStack. >>>> >>>> --David >>> >>> >> >
