+1 Download, installed in clean virtualenv. Executed commands against the cloudstack simulator.
On 16 September 2013 09:24, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Started this wiki page: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudMonkey+testing+procedure > > > > On Sep 15, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Downloaded release artifacts, installed in ubuntu devcloud-kvm, tested > > various sync, async calls and cloudmonkey scripts. Seems to work as > > well or better than previous releases. > > > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Rohit Yadav <bhais...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> +1 > >> > >> Build with cache, checked readme etc. files and installed: > >> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BUM97ZjCQAAOM5v.png:large > >> > >> Since the build cache was created from/against ACS 4.2, as long as the > APIs > >> were compatible so will cloudmonkey be for 4.2 and previous releases > >> including 4.x, 3.x ones. > >> > >> Thanks Chip! > >> > >> Regards. > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Chip Childers < > chip.child...@sungard.com>wrote: > >> > >>> I've created a 5.0.0 release of cloudmonkey, with the following > artifacts > >>> up for a > >>> vote: > >>> > >>> Git Branch and Commit SH: > >>> > >>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/5.0 > >>> Commit: 767bfbe084e24d441f1ad73ace183c09f26a276b > >>> > >>> List of changes: > >>> > >>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES;h=54f2e32357b0a726dc6f202e4897ed4af531f8ab;hb=refs/heads/5.0 > >>> > >>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > >>> location): > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-5.0.0/ > >>> > >>> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > >>> > >>> I have not created testing instructions for this release artifact, but > >>> would appreciate help documenting it as people to it. > >>> > >>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >>> > >>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate > >>> "(binding)" with their vote? > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 approve > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> -chip > >>> > >
