On Sep 11, 2013, at 5:25 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" <imusa...@webmd.net> wrote:
> As mentioned on private, I think the reason we have so few responders when it > comes to voting - is because it takes considerable amount of time to build, > test and QA. And if you take voting serious as everyone should, you have to > QA before you can vote. > > > > Perhaps we should spent some time on automation and take an automation step > further. > > > > My next dream project is to create a set of 3 virtual appliances. > > > > Set 1: > > 2 KVM Hypervisors preconfigured with NFS > > 1 CloudStack MS with latest RC code > > > > Set 2: > > 2 XEN Hypervisors preconfigured with NFS > > 1 CloudStack MS with latest RC code > > > > Set 3: > > 1 CloudStack MS with latest RC code > > > > Set 3 get a bit hairy because of Virtual Center and licensing, so we abstract > it and let folks QA what they have. > > ------------------------------------------------- > > Do you find this approach useful, or do you believe the build tests we do is > sufficient? > > Who can join or atleast share scripts they use to automate provisioning of > KVM and XEN hosts? > > I'm looking for set of "post" scripts they can configure XEN and KVM end 2 > end. > > Thanks > ilya Ilya, I think this is in-line with what Marcus is proposing. In another thread on testing I proposed to have a meeting where anyone interested in testing can join and where we can hash out a plan, then report back to the list. -sebastien
