I am cancelling this VOTE and I will start another VOTE thread when I have a new RC build available shortly
Edison is helping me out with the git merge issue. There are a number of fixes that I would like to pick up so as well merge the branch from 4.2-forward Thanks Animesh > -----Original Message----- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:05 PM > To: Mike Tutkowski; Brian Federle > Cc: [email protected]; Jessica Wang > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > Ok so git experts on the list I should skip Mike's merge commit and > instead pick the one from Jessica? > > Thanks > Animesh > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:03 PM > To: Brian Federle > Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; [email protected]; Jessica Wang > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > Yeah, I agree. :) I think I merged instead of rebased. > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Brian Federle > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Probably something just got messed up during the rebase, I see this > commit below yours: > > commit ae68c841f668768118bbff07f07060416fb16d48 > Author: Jessica Wang > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Mon Aug 26 14:24:22 2013 -0700 > > CLOUDSTACK-4089: UI > zone wizard > hypervisor VMware > configure > physical network > edit traffic type label > split > > Which modifies system.js -- probably committed at the same time as you. > > I only think this because I've definitely screwed stuff up in git myself > in the past when I forget to rebase :D > > -Brian > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:56 PM > To: Mike Tutkowski > Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Brian > Federle; Jessica Wang > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > Mike the commit message shows it is a merge "Merge remote-tracking > branch 'upstream/4.2-forward' into 4.2-forward" > > Adding Brian and Jessica to the thread. > > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:45 PM > To: Animesh Chaturvedi > Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Brian > Federle > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > I don't understand how those got in there. > > I think they were merged into my code from Jessica's earlier checkin. > > They are not related to my fix. > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > Mike with your commit 6a2f15f94ae74b563a2d4df6da38e7f6ff44c8ac > > I see a few changes to > > Ui\scripts\ui-custom\zoneWizard.js > Ui\scripts\zoneWizard.js > > Are they needed for your CHAP changes? These seems unrelated to me. > > > Animesh > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Tutkowski > > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected] > > om>] > > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:44 PM > > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > > > OK, Animesh. > > > > My changes are in 4.2-forward now. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > > > > No problem - I'll let you know when it's there. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < > > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > >> > From: Mike Tutkowski > > >> > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:mike.tutkowski@solidf > > >> > ire.com>] > > >> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:48 PM > > >> > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0 > > >> > > > >> > Hi Animesh, > > >> > > > >> > It is related to adding an iSCSI target to ESX(i). > > >> > > > >> > The 4.2 code assumes you will want to use Mutual CHAP. This fix > > >> > allows the user to not have to use Mutual CHAP. > > >> > > > >> > It's only a small number of changes, pretty low risk, and should > > >> > only impact the SolidFire plug-in as no other plug-in code has > > >> > been written to date that uses the logic in the VMware code that > > >> > I would need to modify. > > >> > > > >> > I've written and tested the code, as well. > > >> > > > >> > Talk to you later, > > >> > > > >> [Animesh>] Can you put your fix in 4.2-forward ASAP > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > > e: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the > > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > > > *(tm)* > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Mike Tutkowski* > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > > e: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302> > > Advancing the way the world uses the > > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play> > > *(tm)* > > > > -- > Mike Tutkowski > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc. > e: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > o: 303.746.7302<tel:303.746.7302> > Advancing the way the world uses the > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm) > > > > -- > Mike Tutkowski > Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc. > e: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > o: 303.746.7302 > Advancing the way the world uses the > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>(tm)
