:} it is due to master moving faster then me being all over the code. I have ported it once again to master and am busy testing again. but we need it and have just moved to 4.1.1. I agree with you Alex. So we will not release our fork just the patch via the earliest main release. (I could publish a 4.1.1 patch however)
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote: > +1 > > If it's due to company specific issues (licensing or company secret). Maybe > we can propose a plugin interface for it and see if you can keep just that > code private. > > Just look at how much master have changed from 4.2. If we can we should try > not to fork on the core code in cloudstack. Maintaining will be tough. > > --Alex > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] >> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 9:51 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases? >> >> Daan and Hugo, >> >> This is just my opinion, you should consider merging this feature into master >> when time allows - this way you don't have to maintain a private branch of >> ACS in the future. Just my two cents :) >> >> Regards >> ilya >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 4:13 AM >> > To: dev >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases? >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Musayev, Ilya <imusa...@webmd.net> >> > wrote: >> > > The reason why CloudSand was created, was to bring in urgently >> > > needed >> > features into stable version, such that on the next major upgrade to >> > ACS, all features work as expected and nothing should break. >> > This is the same that we have done. Except that we have put work into >> > CLOUDSTACK-1532 that was urgently needed internally at Schuberg >> > Philis. It is implemented in 4.1.1-SBP a private release. I have >> > ported it to master several times but testing and paralel development >> > on other network features have prevented it from being merged in master. >> > >> > > What features are we talking about? >> > >> > I gues our focus is hastening our own development and not backporting. >> > >> > regards, >> > Daan >> >
