-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12961/#review23915
-----------------------------------------------------------



setup/db/templates.sql
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/12961/#comment47764>

    The system VM template here is for acton. Shouldn't it be updated to 4.2 ?
    Use the following info:
    
    Hypervisor  Download URL    Date verified   Comments
    Xenserver   
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
          OS Type : Debian/Linux 6(64-bit)
    KVM 
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
                 
    VMware (generic)    
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova            
generic; OS Type : Debian/Linux 5.0 (32-bit)
    VMWare (ESX 5.*)    
    http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh8.ova
    
    
        optimised for ESX 5.0; OS Type : Debian/Linux 5.0 (32-bit)
    
    
    


- Abhinandan Prateek


On July 26, 2013, 6:30 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12961/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 26, 2013, 6:30 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3723
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
>     CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type 
> Information on the Database.
> 
>     This commit also contains the guestOS addition of new CentOS releases
>     supported by XenServer 6.2
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   setup/db/templates.sql 313a68d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12961/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Verified by setting up the CS environment and also user VM deploys 
> successfully.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sanjay Tripathi
> 
>

Reply via email to