Add Daan's gmail.

--Sheng


On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:

> Daan, I've checked the code, the issue is, original code Bharat
> wrote(generated dnsmasq.conf) cannot deal with VPC. e.g. the VPC router
> wouldn't listen on eth0 and eth1, but non-vpc router wouldn't listen on
> eth1 and eth2. Also, some detail configurations of VPC are written into
> /etc/dnsmasq.d/cloud.conf, rather than dnsmasq.conf, because it need to
> deal with multiple nics with different range.
>
> So using non-vpc's configuration just break whole VPC function. No chance
> it can work because eth2(which is internal network interface in VPC) is
> excluded from listening interface.
>
> We need to deal with it ASAP because it's blocking the regression test. In
> fact I didn't see much solution for now except reverting it since the
> dnsmasq config command didn't support VPC anyway.
>
> BTW, I don't agree that we need dnsmasq configuration file generated by
> cloudstack, since it's possible that the scripts in the VR would modify the
> file as well(e.g. in cloud-early-setup), then the modification would be
> overrided by whole new file generated by management server(which happened
> in this case). We have to gather them in one place. I've talked with Bharat
> and he would provide a patch soon to revert the DnsMasqConfigurator, and
> use bash scripts to do the necessary substitute instead. I think any
> potential change to dnsmasq config command need to wait for it.
>
> --Sheng
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote:
>
>> Daan,
>>
>> Bharat thinks your fix caused a block bug
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3589? Could you check
>> it?
>>
>> --Sheng
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Bharat Kumar <bharat.ku...@citrix.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dann,
>>>
>>> The bug fix
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=b903262df5e2ff5d174859ce28abae75c4689f0cis
>>> causing an null value in dnsmasq.config file while creating VPC network
>>> (bug-id Cloudstack-3589 ).
>>>
>>> Can you please take a look at this.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bharat.
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to