All of our tests go over 8080, I explained this to Prachi last night
over IRC. The logs I picked out oddly had only system-background
threads. I'll add more relevant logs.

or you can run the test_affinity_groups.py tests against a simulator
run from test/integration/component/. That's how I repro-ed the issue.

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:14:19PM +0000, Prachi Damle wrote:
> Prasanna does the regression  test scripts call using 8096 port?
> 
> If yes then that's the reason why the API is failing.
> 
> From: Alena Prokharchyk
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 4:13 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Prachi Damle; Alex Huang
> Subject: Re: deleteAffinityGroup API
> 
> If the API came through port 8096, then the caller comes as a System context 
> (System default user id=1, account id=1). It was always like this since the 
> time the UserContext was introduced.
> 
> -Alena.
> 
> From: Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com<mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com>>
> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" 
> <dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Date: Thursday, July 18, 2013 4:00 PM
> To: Prachi Damle <prachi.da...@citrix.com<mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com>>, 
> "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" 
> <dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
> Subject: RE: deleteAffinityGroup API
> 
> This one is a problem.  I will look into it.  In the bug description, all the 
> logs were background threads.  All of CloudStack background threads act with 
> system context.  That's correct.  That's why I closed it out.
> 
> Here I think you're actually saying that when called through admin API, it 
> came in as System context.  That would be a bug if I understand you correctly.
> 
> --Alex
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prachi Damle
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 11:55 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Cc: Alex Huang
> Subject: RE: deleteAffinityGroup API
> Hi Alex,
> The error thrown while deleting affinitygroup by Id is: " Account and
> domainId are needed for resource creation "
> Many of our APIs call AccntManager to figure out owner of the resources the
> API is working on like this:
>          Account caller = CallContext.current().getCallingAccount(); 
> //earlier it
> was using UserContext and was replaced by CallContext
>          Account owner = _accountMgr.finalizeOwner(caller, account, domainId,
> null);
> And AccountManager: finalizeOwner has this check at start:
>          if (caller.getId() == Account.ACCOUNT_ID_SYSTEM && ((accountName
> == null || domainId == null) && projectId == null)) {
>              throw new InvalidParameterValueException("Account and domainId
> are needed for resource creation");
>          }
> Now the CallContext.current().getCallingAccount(); is returning the System
> user causing the subsequent failure. Why would it return system user, if the
> caller is admin user?
> Thanks,
> Prachi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 6:09 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: deleteAffinityGroup API
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:17:46PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 07:14:42AM +0000, Prachi Damle wrote:
> > > Account and domainId are not required parameters of this API. It
> > > works fine with just an id too.
> > >
> > > Account and domain will be used if delete is called providing a name
> > > of the group instead of id, say by an admin for a regular user's
> > > group.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks Prachi - I think it is related to the recent changes in
> > CallContext that is making the user system for the API call preventing
> > it from deleteing the aff.group with just an id. Filed a bug for it.
> Ok - Alex mentioned the bug is 'Not a Problem'. So it's only the background
> CS workers which use the CallContext. But the affinity group is still failing 
> to
> delete using the id.
> --
> Prasanna.,
> ------------------------
> Powered by BigRock.com
> 
> 

-- 
Prasanna.,

------------------------
Powered by BigRock.com

Reply via email to