The bug seems introduced in 13691048fb622467271b75fc7b64298e3afe9912, which is 
committed at March 16. So 4.1 should have the same issue.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 4:13 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Fang Wang; Edison Su
> Cc: cloudstack
> Subject: RE: Review Request 12144: Create template from snapshot, failed
> due to the vmdk file failure.
> 
> Is this applicable to 4.1?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Fang Wang [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Fang
> > Wang
> > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 7:11 PM
> > To: edison su
> > Cc: cloudstack; Fang Wang
> > Subject: Review Request 12144: Create template from snapshot, failed
> > due to the vmdk file failure.
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12144/
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
> >
> >
> > Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2384
> >
> >
> > Repository: cloudstack-git
> >
> >
> > Description
> > -------
> >
> > This is for master-6-17-stable. Fix the bug cloudstack-2384
> >
> >
> > Diffs
> > -----
> >
> >
> >
> plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/
> > VmwareStorageManagerImpl.java 4ae0f30
> >
> > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12144/diff/
> >
> >
> > Testing
> > -------
> >
> > Create snapshot;
> > Create template of the snapshot, now the vmdk file is correctly
> > created in template directory.
> >
> > [root@nfs2 209]# ls -lt
> > total 410724
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 420134912 Jun 27 14:19 585fcc4b-a00b-4dc3-a03b-
> > cab09c41cd15-disk0.vmdk
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root       239 Jun 27 14:19 d2d4d8f2-2916-4034-8053-
> > 3ed011d1be6e.ova.meta
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root       299 Jun 27 14:19 template.properties
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root      3839 Jun 27 14:19 585fcc4b-a00b-4dc3-a03b-
> > cab09c41cd15.ovf
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Fang Wang

Reply via email to